Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory (
More info?)
"Clinton" <Clinton@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:04D8ADBC-4E0E-4D17-BB75-C1056C071462@microsoft.com...
> We are trying to apply similar security measures to DC's and member
servers
> using policies applied to the OU.
Build the policy once (with the common settings)
and link it TWICE (unless the OUs are in a parent-child
relationship.)
It is perfectly legal to use a GPO for multiple disparate
OUs.
--
Herb Martin
"Clinton" <Clinton@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:04D8ADBC-4E0E-4D17-BB75-C1056C071462@microsoft.com...
> We are trying to apply similar security measures to DC's and member
servers
> using policies applied to the OU.
>
> "Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP]" wrote:
>
> > Clinton,
> >
> > What is it that you are trying to accomplish? Maybe we can help you get
to
> > where you need to get.....
> >
> > --
> > Cary W. Shultz
> > Roanoke, VA 24014
> > Microsoft Active Directory MVP
> >
> >
http://www.activedirectory-win2000.com
> >
http://www.grouppolicy-win2000.com
> >
> >
> >
> > "Clinton" <Clinton@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:3CB580D0-F49B-4E57-BBD0-21F608239B05@microsoft.com...
> > > Is there any problem DC's and Member servers being in the same OU?
> >
> >
> >