nottheking :
Thank you, this is another area that I should have gone further in depth with. As I mentioned, early on in the piece, originally this was planned as a fairly straight forward informative article and just continually grew. In this particular section I should have titled it differently as I was thinking of the page file as the virtual disk, swap file as what most think of as the systems virtual memory. My apologies to all.
Not a problem to me. Mostly just that, since I predict this article will likely be an often-referenced one, (an opinion I can see I'm not alone in, judging by other other replies) it'd be best to make sure to avoid being misleading.
A corrected section likely wouldn't have to be anywhere NEAR as long as my reply there, (I'm more known for being thorough vs. concise) but should definitely specify that it's the "page file" is what the extra space on-disk is, and perhaps "virtual memory" can be abstracted to simply mean "technology that lets programs use all the memory space they want, including page file."
___________________
Will check into this, I think it's doable, and again thank you for the input
Dan414 :
Great article, thanks!
Would love to see some common symptoms of a "bad" stick when you write the second half.
I had a second computer (for my boys) that I struggled with getting to run right for months - turned out to be bad memory. I had blue screens and random restarts until swapping in some known good memory.
____________________
Symptoms can vary, and can actually include a number of possible causes, when you first put a rig together, it can be a good idea to run Memtest86 on each stick individually (running multiple sticks can actually cause false positive errors. I normally run 4-5 passes and if good leave things at that unless problems develop. Then down the road if you start getting unexplained BSODs, freezes, etc thet can be indicative of DRAM (or again, other) problems. Overall, DRAM failure rates are extremely low and of the 'failures', or DRAM that gets RMAed as defective, more often than not there's nothing wrong with the sticks, but the problems with the DRAM come from users not knowing how to set it up to run to spec or people trying to mix DRAM from different packages. The second part is already written and winding it's way through the system, the tentative publication date is 17 June, and has been titled "The Most Common DDR DRAM Myths Debunked.".
As written it covers the following 'myths' and is a continuation of this first piece,
It’s DDR3, all DDR3 is the same.
Just add more DRAM, it will be perfectly fine.
There are only a couple of companies that make DIMMS then they all get rebranded.
Your motherboard supports 3200 DRAM so you can use any DRAM you want.
Mixed DRAM can only run at the speed (or timings) of the slowest DIMM you are using.
Just buy 2 sets of two DIMMs rather than those more expensive 4 DIMM sets, it’s cheaper.
If you fill all four DRAM slots it will run faster.
You won’t see any performance gain with DRAM faster than 1600.
8GB is all anyone needs (or 8GB is all you’ll need for the next X Years).
You’ll never use or need 16GB (or 32GB or 64GB or….)
More DRAM won’t speed things up any.
A 64bit OS will let you run all the DRAM you want.
1.65 DRAM will damage your Intel CPU.
Putting DRAM in dual channel doubles the data rate, or is twice as fast.