judging by the clock rates these are laptop CPUs.
anyways, the first difference is the clock rate, AMD runs at 2.0Ghz, 200Mhz faster than the Intel processor, which means it runs more cycles per second than the Intel processor can.
But it doesn't necessarily mean it's stronger, another big factor is IPC, or instructions per cycle, how many instructions a processor can run in a cycle (the cpu then runs however many cycles a second through its clock rate). Then there are instruction sets that are related to software and other hardware interactions which I won't get into.
generally, Intel processors of the same generation/release date/time period as an AMD processor will have strong IPC than the AMD processor. For example, an i5 3570 is clocked at 3.4Ghz, while the FX 8350 is clocked at 4.0Ghz, but when comparing core to core, the i5 trumps the fx by a lot. It's the nature of the way the chips are built.
it's the same concept for comparing laptop processors too. However your question is VERY open ended and can have a million different answers. If you're comparing say an Intel Celeron processor to an AMD A6, the A6 will win hands down because the microarchitecture of a Celeron processor is not designed to be high performance, so it'll lose in performance.
However, some of the higher end laptop processors like i5's and i7's often win against the AMD laptop APUs because of superior microarchitecture.