I'm new at all this advanced RAID setup business so please be gentle.
We've ordered a Dell T320 with Perc h710 RAID card, with 8bay hotswap, 2x 300GB SAS drives and 4x4TB SAS drives. It'll be running Windows 2012 R2 as a simple fileserver. (It's for a design house dealing with 3d/video/animation if you want to know why they need so much space). Storage capacity is more important than performance but we're trying to get a happy medium where possible.
The plan was that the 2x300GB drives would for the OS, be configured as RAID1 with the drives mounted internally. The 4x4TB drives were to be configured as RAID5 in the hotswap bays, leaving 4x hotbay drives empty for when the inevitable happens and we need to expand the disk capacity.
I had actually ordered this with the requirement that the 2x 300GB drives were to be mounted internally, not in the Hotswap bay but on arrival the machine arrived with them installed in the hotswap bay, taking away two potential slots for more 4TB drives. A call to Dell said that it's not possible to mount the two system drives internally at the same time as the 8x Hotswap system.
My first question that the DELL rep never successfully answered to me was why is this the case?
Can't the PERC h710 card deal with both scenarios at the same time? If not, doesn't the motherboard have rudimentary RAID onboard and if not, could I not just add another RAID card to the system and run it that way?
Do I have any other options here before I resort to plan B which is to discard the two 300GB drives and install the OS on the 4x4TB disk array?
Which brings me to Part 2 of the question. Assuming I have to put the OS on the Disk Array with all the 4TB drives, can I set up a virtual drive/partition for the OS *AND* still be able to utilise the 'Online Capacity Expansion' [OCE] so that when it comes to needing more drives, I can just stick some more in?
I'm quite keen to try and keep the OS side of thing separate from the data for my own OCD reasons more than anything else but are there any technical reasons this is a bad idea?
So a brief recap...
Plan A: My preferred Solution.
2x300GB drives RAID 1 for OS, mounted internally.
4x4TB drives RAID5 = 12TB
Expansion potential: another 16TB via OCE
Total data capacity: 28TB
Plan B
4x4TB drives RAID5 = 12TB (300GB partition for OS / rest for data),
Expansion Potential: 12TB in second 4x4TB RAID5 array as OCE might won't work
Total data capacity: 24TB-300GB
Plan C
4x4TB drives RAID5 = 12TB (OS installed in main virtual drive),
Expansion potential: another 16TB via OCE
Total data capacity 28TB - OS overhead.
Plan D (default Dell setup)
2x300GB drives taking up two Hotswap bays
4x4TB drives RAID5 = 12TB
Expansion potential: another 2x4TB (8TB) via OCE
Total data capacity: 20TB
Have I missed something important?
Is plan A possible and if so how do I go about it?
If not, could I have some pros and cons advice of doing any of the other options.
Any other ways around this?
Are there any tricks/gotchas that Windows 2012 might bring to the table?
We've ordered a Dell T320 with Perc h710 RAID card, with 8bay hotswap, 2x 300GB SAS drives and 4x4TB SAS drives. It'll be running Windows 2012 R2 as a simple fileserver. (It's for a design house dealing with 3d/video/animation if you want to know why they need so much space). Storage capacity is more important than performance but we're trying to get a happy medium where possible.
The plan was that the 2x300GB drives would for the OS, be configured as RAID1 with the drives mounted internally. The 4x4TB drives were to be configured as RAID5 in the hotswap bays, leaving 4x hotbay drives empty for when the inevitable happens and we need to expand the disk capacity.
I had actually ordered this with the requirement that the 2x 300GB drives were to be mounted internally, not in the Hotswap bay but on arrival the machine arrived with them installed in the hotswap bay, taking away two potential slots for more 4TB drives. A call to Dell said that it's not possible to mount the two system drives internally at the same time as the 8x Hotswap system.
My first question that the DELL rep never successfully answered to me was why is this the case?
Can't the PERC h710 card deal with both scenarios at the same time? If not, doesn't the motherboard have rudimentary RAID onboard and if not, could I not just add another RAID card to the system and run it that way?
Do I have any other options here before I resort to plan B which is to discard the two 300GB drives and install the OS on the 4x4TB disk array?
Which brings me to Part 2 of the question. Assuming I have to put the OS on the Disk Array with all the 4TB drives, can I set up a virtual drive/partition for the OS *AND* still be able to utilise the 'Online Capacity Expansion' [OCE] so that when it comes to needing more drives, I can just stick some more in?
I'm quite keen to try and keep the OS side of thing separate from the data for my own OCD reasons more than anything else but are there any technical reasons this is a bad idea?
So a brief recap...
Plan A: My preferred Solution.
2x300GB drives RAID 1 for OS, mounted internally.
4x4TB drives RAID5 = 12TB
Expansion potential: another 16TB via OCE
Total data capacity: 28TB
Plan B
4x4TB drives RAID5 = 12TB (300GB partition for OS / rest for data),
Expansion Potential: 12TB in second 4x4TB RAID5 array as OCE might won't work
Total data capacity: 24TB-300GB
Plan C
4x4TB drives RAID5 = 12TB (OS installed in main virtual drive),
Expansion potential: another 16TB via OCE
Total data capacity 28TB - OS overhead.
Plan D (default Dell setup)
2x300GB drives taking up two Hotswap bays
4x4TB drives RAID5 = 12TB
Expansion potential: another 2x4TB (8TB) via OCE
Total data capacity: 20TB
Have I missed something important?
Is plan A possible and if so how do I go about it?
If not, could I have some pros and cons advice of doing any of the other options.
Any other ways around this?
Are there any tricks/gotchas that Windows 2012 might bring to the table?