?? "Did I miss something?" (CO rules)

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.mahjong (More info?)

Friends,

Once again I ask you an assistance to clarify CO rules.

Having entirely concealed so far hand B 345678 C11 D45678 I claim from
someone D3 (I was allowed to go out) to win.

My count:
Short Straight in two suits: 2*1=2 pts.
Mixed Double Chow, twice: 2*1=2 pts.
Concealed Hand: 2 pts.
Chow Hand: 2 pts.
-------------
Total = 8 pts. (enough)

Although 4W (v. 2.01) says again: "Faulty Declaration".

Perhaps, I mistreated "Chow Hand"? It says in Rules "A hand consisting
of all runs and no HONORS". It did not tell no TERMINALS.

Perhaps, having Short Straigh TWICE I allegedly cannot count for Mixed
Double Chow twice? (Like in my hand). But say having B 123456 and D
456789 hand has clearly TWO Short Straights and only ONE Mixed Double
Chow. So argument for "what is implied is not counted" does not work
here.

Tell me, please, what's wrong?
I am not blaiming anybody. But instead I want to be sure that my
strategy, my way of thinking works.


Looking forward,
Vitaly
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.mahjong (More info?)

Vitaly wrote:
>
>Having entirely concealed so far hand B 345678 C11 D45678 I claim from
>someone D3 (I was allowed to go out) to win.
>
>My count:
>Short Straight in two suits: 2*1=2 pts.
>Mixed Double Chow, twice: 2*1=2 pts.
>Concealed Hand: 2 pts.
>Chow Hand: 2 pts.
>-------------
>Total = 8 pts. (enough)

Sounds right to me, Vitaly. Have you emailed Arto to ask him how 4W
calculates it?

Tom
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.mahjong (More info?)

"Tom Sloper" <tomster@sloperamaNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:NOxwc.51017$eY2.16853@attbi_s02...
> Vitaly wrote:
> >
> >Having entirely concealed so far hand B 345678 C11 D45678 I claim from
> >someone D3 (I was allowed to go out) to win.
> >
> >My count:
> >Short Straight in two suits: 2*1=2 pts.
> >Mixed Double Chow, twice: 2*1=2 pts.
> >Concealed Hand: 2 pts.
> >Chow Hand: 2 pts.
> >-------------
> >Total = 8 pts. (enough)
>
> Sounds right to me, Vitaly. Have you emailed Arto to ask him how 4W
> calculates it?
>
> Tom

Hi Vitaly and Tom,

I never played games by the CMCR (or "CO") before, but from my understanding
of the CMCR, you can EITHER take "Short Straight" OR "Mixed Double Chow",
you can't take BOTH. Refer to the "Non-repetitive Principle" (CMCR, art.
10.1(5)1).

Let me know if I'm wrong.

Cofa Tsui
www.iMahjong.com
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.mahjong (More info?)

Vitaly:
>>>Short Straight in two suits: 2*1=2 pts.
>>>Mixed Double Chow, twice: 2*1=2 pts.
>>>Concealed Hand: 2 pts.
>>>Chow Hand: 2 pts.
>>>-------------
>>>Total = 8 pts. (enough)

Tom:
>> Sounds right to me, Vitaly. Have you emailed Arto to ask him how 4W
>> calculates it?

Cofa:
>I never played games by the CMCR (or "CO") before, but from my
understanding
>of the CMCR, you can EITHER take "Short Straight" OR "Mixed Double Chow",
>you can't take BOTH. Refer to the "Non-repetitive Principle" (CMCR, art.
>10.1(5)1).

Ryan Morris discussed this rule on Martin's forum. As I interpret Ryan's
statement of the rule, when three chows are used to create mixed shifted
chows (or any other 3-chow scoring combination), a 4th chow can only be
combined with one of the first 3 chows (the others having been "used up"
when counted towards the first scoring combination).

So it's not so much as a NON-repeating rule, but a partially-repeating rule
subject to strictures that have not yet been adequately translated into
English. It could be that this is the reason for why Four Winds didn't
permit Vitaly to go out - only Arto can say for sure.

Tom
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.mahjong (More info?)

> Tom:
> >> Sounds right to me, Vitaly. Have you emailed Arto to ask him how 4W
> >> calculates it?
Sorry, not yet.

>
> Cofa:
> >I never played games by the CMCR (or "CO") before, but from my
> understanding
> >of the CMCR, you can EITHER take "Short Straight" OR "Mixed Double Chow",
> >you can't take BOTH. Refer to the "Non-repetitive Principle" (CMCR, art.
> >10.1(5)1).

> Ryan Morris discussed this rule on Martin's forum. As I interpret Ryan's
> statement of the rule, when three chows are used to create mixed shifted
> chows (or any other 3-chow scoring combination), a 4th chow can only be
> combined with one of the first 3 chows (the others having been "used up"
> when counted towards the first scoring combination).
>
> So it's not so much as a NON-repeating rule, but a partially-repeating rule
> subject to strictures that have not yet been adequately translated into
> English. It could be that this is the reason for why Four Winds didn't
> permit Vitaly to go out - only Arto can say for sure.
>
> Tom


I would like say something on Chow-based rules in CO.

1. Before starting, let's define term DIMENSION (for Chows). Each Chow
has THREE Dimensions (imagine 3 rays coming from Chow like XYZ axes):
* one is in the same Suit, same Chow
* the second is in the same Suit, different Chow,
* the third is for combinations with other Suits.

2. In general, I agree on that if some Chow was counted for some
combination it should NOT be counted in the same Dimension, though
it's nothing wrong for the same Chow to be counted in the other
Dimensions.

Some examples:
A. B123 B123 B456 ==> points for B123+B123 and B123+B456 and NOT for
B123 (the second one)+B456 due to B456 has been already counted.
B. B123 C234 D345 B456 ==> points for B123+C234+D345 and for B123+B456
and NOT for C234+D345+B456 due to C234, D345 have been already
counted.
C. B123+B456 C123+C456
D. B123+B456 C234+C567
E. B123+B456 C456+C789

3. Let's look at examples C-D-E. In all three cases we have two Short
Straights in two (analysis is valid for ONE Suit also) Suits. Let's
assume that we have already counted points for two Short Straights
(i.e. "used" Dimensions of the Second Type for both Suits).
When look closely one can see significant DIFFERENCE in three cases:
* C has TWO more combinations for scoring -- B123+C123 and B456+C456
* D has NO additional combinations
* E has ONE more combination for scoring -- B456+C456

Since, there are 4 different Short Straight in one Suit, there are
4*4=16 combinations of two Short Staright in two Suits.

Out of 16 cases: 4 cases would be of "example C" type, 2 cases of
"example E" type, the rest 16-4-2=10 cases would be of "example D"
type.

Moral here: since C, D and E cases are different it sounds logical to
treat them differently: count Mixed Double Chow twice in "C", once in
"E", no additional point in "D".

QUESTION: What is Rules interpretation in this case(s)?

4. Good thing to ponder on is a hand with 4 Chows, where each Chow has
been already counted toward some of combinations (like two Short
Straights).
In such a hand (4 "used up" Chows) when Pair is NOT a Pair of Honors
we "automatically" add points for "Chow Hand". So the Pair of
not-Honors costs 2 pts.

It may sound not fair but ii is a matter of agreement. Similar feeling
I found when calculating hand described in Tom Sloper's Strategy
Column #163:
Having "Four Little Winds" = 64 pts. which "occupies" 11 tiles you
automatically get at least "Half Flush" (even for ordinary Chow made
of 3 left 3 tiles). When 3 left tiles constitutes a Pung of Terminals
or better you get "All Terminals or Honors" = 32 pts. So, 32 pts. for
3 tiles. Good deal!!

With the best,

Vitaly Novikov
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.mahjong (More info?)

Greetings fellow Mahjong afficiandos:

About the issue regarding chows...

The method for counting Chow-based hands is,
to be frank, convoluted.
Although Vitaly Novikov made a valiant attempt
to break the system down into sensible parts,
I believe that it scored 4 points for:

C. B123+B456 C123+C456

....when in practice this pattern scores only 3 points.

The following is a description of what I and a number
of teachers of the rules have used to describe
the method for scoring chows. It involves a concept
of "using up" chows once they have been counted.

1. Take the largest grouping of chows that compose
a hand.
For example, Mixed Shifted Chows (3 chows), Mixed Straight
(3 chows)Pure Straight (3 chows), Pure Double Chow (2 chows),
Mixed Double Chow (2 chows), or Short Straight (2 chows).
Define this grouping of chows as "used" and count the points.
If you have "used" 2 chows, go to step 2. If you have
"used" 3 chows, go to step 3.

2. Now that you have "used" 2 chows, you may attempt to
use your 3rd chow if you have one. If the 3rd chow can
be added to some part of the 2 "used" chows, then you
may add it and score the appropriate points. However, it
can only be added to 1 one of the "used" chows, not both,
therefore it can only score up to 1 extra point
(once you have "used" B123 456, adding B123 scores a point
from combining with either B123 (Pure Double Chow) or B456
(Short Straight), but not both).

3. Now that you have "used" 3 chows, you may attempt to
use your 4th chow if you have one. The 4th chow may be combined
with one, but not more than one, of the used chows.


Example 1:
B123 456 C123 456 (Total: 3 points)
Use B123 456 for 1 point. (Short Straight)
Add C123 to B123 for 1 point. (Mixed Double Chow)
Add C456 to C123 (Short Straight) OR add it to
B456 (Mixed Double Chow) but not both for 1 point.
The total is 3 points.

Note that the following pattern yields the same 3 points:
B123 456 C456 789.

Example 2:
B123 456 789 789 (Total: 17 points)
Use B123 456 789 for 16 points. (Pure Straight)
Add B789 to B123 (Terminal Chows) OR to B456
(Short Straight) OR to B789 (Mixed Double Chow)
but not to more than one.

I hope this helps. If anybody has a more succinct
explanation, I would be more than happy to hear it.

Ryan Morris
Mahjong Museum
Kindai Mahjong
Tokyo
rmorris@hotmail.com
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.mahjong (More info?)

rmorris2001@hotmail.com (Ryan C. Morris) wrote in message news:<cb37f914.0406150146.6ac6a58c@posting.google.com>...

Thank you Ryan for detailed explanation. It was very helpful!

> About the issue regarding chows...
> The method for counting Chow-based hands is,
> to be frank, convoluted.
> ...
> The following is a description of what I and a number
> of teachers of the rules have used to describe
> the method for scoring chows. It involves a concept
> of "using up" chows once they have been counted.

I wonder here it that ruling described somewhere in Official booklet
of CO rules? I doubt that it is mentioned among 81 numbered rules.
Maybe, somewhere in comments? Otherwise, that might be misleading for
Novices or player who just switched to CO rules from other ones.

> 1. Take the largest grouping of chows that compose
> a hand.
> For example, Mixed Shifted Chows (3 chows), Mixed Straight
> (3 chows)Pure Straight (3 chows), Pure Double Chow (2 chows),
> Mixed Double Chow (2 chows), or Short Straight (2 chows).

There is one more rarest grouping here: "4 Same Pure Chows" where all
4 Chows are "used up". Though that comment would not break nice
explanation.


Best Regards,

Vitaly Novikov
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.mahjong (More info?)

"Ryan C. Morris" <rmorris2001@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cb37f914.0406150146.6ac6a58c@posting.google.com...
> Greetings fellow Mahjong afficiandos:
>
> About the issue regarding chows...
>
> The method for counting Chow-based hands is,
> to be frank, convoluted.
> Although Vitaly Novikov made a valiant attempt
> to break the system down into sensible parts,
> I believe that it scored 4 points for:
>
> C. B123+B456 C123+C456
>
> ...when in practice this pattern scores only 3 points.
>

Thanks Vitaly and Ryan for sharing the meaningful explanations. I am quite
used to "going by the book" ^_^ After having re-studied the Chinese version
of Chinese Mahjong Contest Rules ("CMCR"), I am afraid my explanations could
be quite different.

To begin with, I took time translating the Chinese rules of article 10.1(5)
as follows:

Article 10.1(5) The principles for computing the basic points
The "Table Of Score Elements" of The Rules is where the computation of
scores of a winning hand shall base on. Upon winning, the major score
elements shall be selected based on the "Table Of Score Elements", and all
possible score elements that are not implied in others shall be formed and
scores of which are added. In addition, when computing the scores the
following principles shall be observed.

1. Non-Repetitive Principle
If a score element shall, at and due to the nature of its formation, imply
the existence of other score elements, then scores of such other score
elements shall not be counted.

2. Non-Separation Principle
When a score element is selected, the combination of its own cannot be
separated to form a new element for further scores.

3. Non-Identical Principle
Pais that have been used to form a score element cannot be used to combine
with other pais to form an identical score element for further scores.

4. Select Higher Principle
If two sets of pais can form two or more score elements but only one of
those elements can be selected, the element with higher scores may be
selected.

5. Select Once Principle
Any pais that have not been used may be selected only once to combine with
pais in other score elements to form a new score element.

For the purposes of easy references, the beginning portion of the article
may be referenced as art. 10.1(5) while the 5 principles shall be referenced
as art. 10.1(5)1, art. 10.1(5)2 and so on.

Now, with Vitaly's sample hand:
> C. B123+B456 C123+C456
I have the following interpretation:
B123+B456 (1 point)
C123+C456 (1 point)
- The above two score elements are selected based on art. 10.1(5).

Can we *also* select
B123+C123 = 1 point, and
B456+C456 = 1 point, for a total of 2 *extra* points?
The answer is no because you can only select one combination (either this
one, or the previous one), as stipulated by art. 10.1(5).
[My previous explanation using art. 10.1(5)1 might sound a little bit
deviated but is also applicable, since (B123+C123) and (B456+C456) are
implied in the existence of B123+B456 and C123+C456.]

If B123456 and C456789 co-exist, you can select only B123456 and C456789 for
2 points, as per art. 10.1(5).

In the following I would like to add some comments to Ryan's explanations
and I base on the CMCR rules as outlined above.

> The following is a description of what I and a number
> of teachers of the rules have used to describe
> the method for scoring chows. It involves a concept
> of "using up" chows once they have been counted.
>
> 1. Take the largest grouping of chows that compose
> a hand.
> For example, Mixed Shifted Chows (3 chows), Mixed Straight
> (3 chows)Pure Straight (3 chows), Pure Double Chow (2 chows),
> Mixed Double Chow (2 chows), or Short Straight (2 chows).
> Define this grouping of chows as "used" and count the points.
> If you have "used" 2 chows, go to step 2. If you have
> "used" 3 chows, go to step 3.
>
> 2. Now that you have "used" 2 chows, you may attempt to
> use your 3rd chow if you have one. If the 3rd chow can
> be added to some part of the 2 "used" chows, then you
> may add it and score the appropriate points. However, it
> can only be added to 1 one of the "used" chows, not both,
> therefore it can only score up to 1 extra point
> (once you have "used" B123 456, adding B123 scores a point
> from combining with either B123 (Pure Double Chow) or B456
> (Short Straight), but not both).

This is in line with art. 10.1(5)5. However, my different understanding is
that sets that can be formed into score elements shall be formed first, as
per art. 10.1(5), and only set(s) that cannot be formed into score elements
may apply the principle of art. 10.1(5)5.

>
> 3. Now that you have "used" 3 chows, you may attempt to
> use your 4th chow if you have one. The 4th chow may be combined
> with one, but not more than one, of the used chows.

This is in line with art. 10.1(5)5.

>
> Example 1:
> B123 456 C123 456 (Total: 3 points)
> Use B123 456 for 1 point. (Short Straight)
> Add C123 to B123 for 1 point. (Mixed Double Chow)
> Add C456 to C123 (Short Straight) OR add it to
> B456 (Mixed Double Chow) but not both for 1 point.
> The total is 3 points.
>
> Note that the following pattern yields the same 3 points:
> B123 456 C456 789.

This is different with my "2 points" interpretation.

>
> Example 2:
> B123 456 789 789 (Total: 17 points)
> Use B123 456 789 for 16 points. (Pure Straight)
> Add B789 to B123 (Terminal Chows) OR to B456
> (Short Straight) OR to B789 (Mixed Double Chow)
> but not to more than one.

This is in line with art. 10.1(5)5.

Let me know if I have any mistake interpreting the rules.

Cofa Tsui
www.iMahjong.com
 

TRENDING THREADS