notty22 :
they won't market a 2 module , 4 core version.
They sell a 6 core Thuban now, so they will market, "the new 8 core BD", which is really 4 cores, but not, its a new take on 4 [strike]cores [/strike] modules that AMD is calling 8 cores.
After all , thats how Windows will see it , lol
maybe they wont. but still, amd's approach to chiplevel multiprocessing module may create a bottleneck. and given that amd has always been behind in FP computation compared to intel (even with PII@3.4G vs C2Q@2.83Ghz), it is a big gamble they are taking.
but maybe they redesigned the FP schedulers to provide better performance, but still, i fear it wont be enough.
but if they were to market them as 4cores, it would mean that they wont be the first 8-core CPU, but it would help them compete with a four for core i7 with a 4 core (8-threaded) BD...and that would sound fancy. just like a four core intel wipes a x6 is some benchmarks
ares1214 :
Speak in english please, whats with all the random n's?
ok. ill see if you can wrap this:
2 core PII: 2x Integer core, 2x Floating Point scheduler, 2x Decoder (3-wide or total of 6-wide). 2x L2 cache
1 module BD: : 2x integer core, 1x Floating Point scheduler, 1x decoder (4-wide). 1 shared L2 cache
only real advance for BD is the new higher IPC due to better prefetch and shared L2 and offcourse the better architecture. meaning integer computation will improve and your office software will open faster.
but things like Ray computation (the kind of things that mordern hardware still laggs) and games, which depend on Floating point calculation are limited due to less hardware to work with. also lets not forget the decoders are now less in number of wide.