ojas :
Doesn't the first picture of Gavin on the 3rd page have low gamma and the second bright one is where the gamma is too high?
It's written the other (incorrect?) way around in the article, i think.
It's opposite. Lower gamma makes the dark areas of an image brighter, hence the entire picture looks brighter. Higher gamma makes the darker areas even darker (i.e., it takes a lot brighter white in the image data to actually be displayed white). Check here for a great tutorial on gamma, especially the section titled "Display Gamma."
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/gamma-correction.htm
ojas :
Now we’ll make the color temp too warm; in other words, below D65.
Shouldn't it be "above D65"? :/
That's incorrect. It actually works backwards/opposite from what one might think. Color temperature originates from the color a flame radiates in relation to the temperature at which it burns. Think back to grade school and playing with the Bunsen burner... the hottest part of the flame (i.e., higher Kelvin) is in the darkest blues, not the reds (i.e, lower temperature/Kelvin). This simple picture helps explain the difference.