DIY cooling experiment (insane results).

May 17, 2018
5
0
10
Hi everyone. The experiment itself is on video.
[video="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE62tgL2HgU&t=192s"][/video]
Fans used:
Deepcool XFAN 120 WL 1pc (4 usd/pc)
XILENCE XF039 2pcs (5usd/pc)
Deepcool Gamer Storm TF120 - 2pcs (10usd/pc)
Graphics card used:
Inno3D GTX 1080 Ti iChill x3
Software used: MSI Afterburner.

I'm very sorry for mu terrible english skills.
 
Thats not even close to insane from my perspective, but adding fans and not making directional airflow isnt good, you have to make push pull configuration to make it possible but that requires some sacrifices.

If you made an bong cooler, freon cooling, or insane/overkill waterloop cooling that would be cool, adding fans its meh.

Well what are the results before and after mod?
Overclocking?
 
Before:
Stock - 1962/1.062 approx. - 79 celsium peak
UV1 - 1962/0.962 - 73 celsium peak
UV2 - 1911/0.925 - 70 celsium peak
UV3 - 1823/0.861 - 66 celsium peak
After:
Stock - 1962/1.062 approx. - 61 celsium peak
UV1 - 1962/0.962 - 57 celsium peak
UV2 - 1911/0.925 - 54 celsium peak
UV3 - 1823/0.861 - 49(!) celsium peak.

Replacing and adding fans is actual for this card, because stock fans are low rpm crap (1700 max).
And i think for the air solution these results are - if not insane - just pretty good.
Heatsink as itself is awesome on this gpu, but thr fans are total trash.
 
Loudness is very subjective thing. But i'm absolutely sure that the gamer storm fans are more quiet even at max rpms than stock cooler.
I think at stock it was 41-43 db, now its about 39-40db