I'm in the process of replacing a 2013 build. Obsolescence these days is not as bad as it was in the 1980s and 1990s when you couldn't buy a computer without someone telling you to wait a year because what you wanted to buy would cost half as much.
But there is obsolescence issues, the RAM is now DDR4 and moving on to DDR5. The psus that were "generally moving to modular" back in 2013 are now almost all modular. (And be warned, never use the modular cables from one company's psu on another company's psu! )
But I will say you know you are driving an antique if:
- You have molex in the build
- You don't have an SSD
- You're playing with less than 8 gigs ram
So it might be time to move on to bigger and better. That's what I'm doing.
But I'm also NOT doing it. I maintain two desktops in the household and during times when the main desktop is down this one is invaluable. It is almost identical to the one I'm replacing downstairs. It loads pages quickly and does home video and is all and all a fine machine. It has more character than the one downstairs because it is in an ATX tower build from, sheesh, I dunno, late 90s or early 00s. It still has a 3.5 inch floppy in it. But it's a 100% 2013 AMD A10-5800k build and it now has 32 (!!!) gigs of DDR3 RAM because when I was pulling the one downstairs apart I said what the heck and put the 16 gigs of RAM upstairs. My son is an intense gamer and for all of its defects this build still allows competitive play.
So one can make a case that a 2013 (or older) build can be great for most people most times. But I would only stick with the older CPU if the board has plenty of room for more RAM (16 gigs) and you can make the move to an SSD. If you don't have SATA....that's a real limitation. I was one of the people who was traumatized by being forced off Win XP which had, as people may recall, a vanishing small limit of 2 gigs of RAM and routine performance on the net was throttled by the combination of no RAM for the intense graphics and massive junk getting downloaded by commercial web sites into the cache. Computers were much more frustrating to use then. I haven't had those experiences since I moved to 16 gigs of RAM builds, I don't know if it's because the net as a whole is getting faster and there is not as much junk, or or whether the computers are just better able to carry the load.
I remember slow computers. Slow pages. Slow web sites. Incredible boot times. I would come down the stairs, turn on the computer, go have coffee and then go upstairs and take a shower, then maybe the computer would be done booting. That was life with XP. Now i wonder why people were sorry to see it go.
So yeah, SSD changes a lot, generous RAM isn't a bad thing to have on a five year build, and I haven't really had a problem with AMD processors. My new mobo has capacity for 64 gigs RAM but I'm sticking with 16. It's just nice to know I can add more if I want to.
Greg N