Question Do you guys think intel pays userbenchmark for rigged performances?

[Saucydrip]

https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i3-8350K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X/3935vs3915

UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-8700

to me it just overall doesnt make any sense why intel's old garbage cpus are just randomly popping up and its apparently better than amds cpus i just realized that... If you feel so agree or disagree show some proof as well!

 

[Saucydrip]

https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-7640X-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600X/m310543vs3956
i dont know if its just me but ya there 4c and t just can compare to amd's mid end cpus doesnt make sense

 

[Dunlop0078]

Well I think userbenchmark takes a gaming slant, it cares more about single core speeds. The benchmark does state "Hugely faster multi core speed" when comparing the 8350k and 1700x, the 1700x just loses out in all the single core tests. The 2700x and 8700 is a better test and the 2700k doesn't lose by much and comes out on top in all the multi core tests, as I would expect.

I wouldn't get all conspiratorial about it. Finding proof is a burden of the accuser.

 

[Dunlop0078]

https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-7640X-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600X/m310543vs3956
i dont know if its just me but ya there 4c and t just can compare to amd's mid end cpus doesnt make sense

It doesn't compare in terms of multi core speeds, the 2600x obliterates it. The i5 catches up when comparing single core speeds.