I was just curious about the preferences here.
2560x1600:
30" monitor
16:10 ratio
100.63 PPI
2560x1440:
27" monitor
16:9 ratio
108.79 PPI
I personally own a 27" 2560x1440 monitor. I like the finer dot pitch and the fact that I get almost the same resolution in a smaller package. I lose 160 horizontal lines of space, but that doesn't matter much to me because the 2560px width is still preserved, and screen width is more important than height. Also, there's the price between. Typically the 27" model will cost less than the 30" bigger brother.
If I were to upgrade this monitor, it would probably have to be a 4K monitor in order for it to be worth it. I know that Eizo already released one, but it's $36,000 at the moment.
2560x1600:
30" monitor
16:10 ratio
100.63 PPI
2560x1440:
27" monitor
16:9 ratio
108.79 PPI
I personally own a 27" 2560x1440 monitor. I like the finer dot pitch and the fact that I get almost the same resolution in a smaller package. I lose 160 horizontal lines of space, but that doesn't matter much to me because the 2560px width is still preserved, and screen width is more important than height. Also, there's the price between. Typically the 27" model will cost less than the 30" bigger brother.
If I were to upgrade this monitor, it would probably have to be a 4K monitor in order for it to be worth it. I know that Eizo already released one, but it's $36,000 at the moment.