Does Ryzen REALLY benefit from faster RAM?

RainOfPain125

Honorable
Feb 24, 2017
125
0
10,680
The motherboard I want to get (ASRock A320M micro atx) says on the store page that



Ryzen series CPUs support DDR4 3200+(OC)/ 2933(OC)/ 2667/ 2400/ 2133 *

Assuming that means I need to somehow force my RAM to run at 3200 mhz / overclock it? Not sure, but main question is would a Ryzen 5 1400 benefit from faster RAM (namely DDR4-2133 versus DDR4-3200) and is it worth forcing / overclocking my RAM to run at 3200 mhz?
 
Solution
Because they want to meet power consumption goals and increase the yield meeting QC requirements, which reduces the price at which they make a profit. A 4 core 3.4GHz chip at 65W and $120 sounds a lot better than a 4 core 3.9GHz chip at 90W and $200. Zen isn't exactly a refined architecture so they're being conservative, future architectures based on Zen are supposed to have higher clockspeeds.
Yes Ryzen benefits from it because the speed of the Infinity Fabric connecting the 2 dies runs at the speed of the memory. For gaming it will be somewhat noticeable, for anything else it won't be. You're not going to get 2133MHz RAM to run at 3200MHz without higher voltage than is supported for the sticks and I'd be surprised if you could get any RAM to 3200MHz on that motherboard, either buy more expensive RAM or don't worry about it.
 

RainOfPain125

Honorable
Feb 24, 2017
125
0
10,680

Nono, the RAM I am getting is 3200 MHz

https://pcpartpicker.com/product/zgJkcf/gskill-memory-f43200c16d8gvk

It's just that I thought the motherboard would make it run at a lower speed or something... idk.. nvm.
 
If you're buying high frequency RAM then why would you buy a motherboard that can't overclock? CPU speed is going to make a lot more of a difference than RAM speed. I agree with the choice of an R5 1400, but I'd rather have a b350 mobo and 2666MHz ram than an A320 board and 3200MHz RAM
 

RainOfPain125

Honorable
Feb 24, 2017
125
0
10,680


Because I didn't particularly want to deal with all the overclocking and picking an aftermarket cooler. If I'm gonna go out and get a good aftermarket cooler, and possibly replace the stock thermal paste, I might as well just ditch the idea and get a Ryzen 5 1600 (which is only 30$ or so more, AND with the bigger wraith cooler I could possibly overclock a good bit without having to get an aftermarket cooler - not that I know anything about overclocking, again)
 

RainOfPain125

Honorable
Feb 24, 2017
125
0
10,680


My main problem with overclocking is there must be a reason the creators of the chip didn't intentionally make the GHz higher, if it can withstand it.

If the CPU can withstand 3.8GHz with the stock cooler, then why does AMD make the CPU run at 3.2 GHz and sometimes at 3.4GHz (if the CPU is "cool" enough for turboboost)
 
Because they want to meet power consumption goals and increase the yield meeting QC requirements, which reduces the price at which they make a profit. A 4 core 3.4GHz chip at 65W and $120 sounds a lot better than a 4 core 3.9GHz chip at 90W and $200. Zen isn't exactly a refined architecture so they're being conservative, future architectures based on Zen are supposed to have higher clockspeeds.
 
Solution

TRENDING THREADS