Hi,
Was thinking of buying another low power Pentium N3700 NUC as a HTPC but then heard that Skylake CPUs may only use a very small amount of power when idle or at least when not doing much.
This article: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/skylake-intel-core-i7-6700k-core-i5-6600k,review-33276-11.html appears to confirm that, with only a 3.8 watt usage on the 6600K at idle?
So my idea was to instead build a PC using Skylake that is on all the time (as a file server), spend the evening using it with Kodi but then if I want to play games I have enough juice - more than with the N3700 anyway.
Given my N3700 is rated at 6w, would the 6600 (I don't want the K version) get anywhere near that when doing similar basic tasks? The article above seems to imply that, yet I can't find a single other bit of corroborating evidence on the net. At the very least, over night when no one is using it, is it's still going to be much more of a drain than a specific low power CPU?
Was thinking of buying another low power Pentium N3700 NUC as a HTPC but then heard that Skylake CPUs may only use a very small amount of power when idle or at least when not doing much.
This article: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/skylake-intel-core-i7-6700k-core-i5-6600k,review-33276-11.html appears to confirm that, with only a 3.8 watt usage on the 6600K at idle?
So my idea was to instead build a PC using Skylake that is on all the time (as a file server), spend the evening using it with Kodi but then if I want to play games I have enough juice - more than with the N3700 anyway.
Given my N3700 is rated at 6w, would the 6600 (I don't want the K version) get anywhere near that when doing similar basic tasks? The article above seems to imply that, yet I can't find a single other bit of corroborating evidence on the net. At the very least, over night when no one is using it, is it's still going to be much more of a drain than a specific low power CPU?