Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (
More info?)
Paul wrote:
> In article <ddzJd.6348$IJ5.267@okepread02>, "Richard Higgins"
> <higginsoft@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>>If you are going to use an Athlon 64 and use Microsoft Word, don't get a
>>Radeon 9800. I don't know about any other Radeons. Their driver (Catalyst)
>>and MS Word do not play together well. Running MS Word will cause your
>>system to automatically reboot, usually within 2 minutes after MS Word has
>>started.
>>
>>If you are having this problem already, uninstall the Radeon driver and see
>>if MS Word works. You'll see that it does. Reinstall the drivers and MS
>>Word won't work.
>>
>>There are some that have installed old versions of the Radeon drivers and
>>even Radeon 9600 drivers for their Radeon 9800 and got MS Word to work with
>>it.
>>
>>Radeon's fix is to dummy down the board to where you might as well have
>>gotten a cheap generic graphics card.
>>
>>My solution was to get an nVidia 6800. Works like a charm.
>>
>>-------------
>>Richard A. Higgins
>
>
> Based on other threads of yours, it seems you are making an assumption
> that since you managed to install an OS on your new computer, and
> it doesn't crash right away, that all the hardware is well adjusted
> and fault free.
>
> There are a couple of test programs you should be aware of.
>
> Memtest86 is a free test program from memtest.org . It is available
> in two versions - one version formats a bootable floppy for you,
> while the other version is used to prepare a bootable ISO CD.
> Memtest86 is unique, in that it tests all of the memory on the
> computer - it even "moves" the executable out of the way and
> tests the memory underneath.
>
> Memtest86 should be error free in an extended testing period
> (like at least a couple of hours). If memtest86 is finding errors,
> you need to look into adjusting the BIOS on your computer. One
> quick fix, is to bump up Vdimm to a level suitable for high
> performance memory. (2.75V shouldn't hurt anything.)
>
> The second program you should get a copy of, is Prime95 from
> mersenne.org . Prime95 contains a built-in test function, called
> the "torture test". When the "torture test" is run, Prime95
> carries out a calculation with a known result. If Prime95
> detects an error in this calculation, it will print the
> error to the screen. I find Prime95 can find speed related
> errors that don't happen in memtest86, so running both programs
> has value.
>
> If you cannot run both of these programs error free, solve the
> underlying problem first, before proceeding further.
>
> In another thread I found in Google from you:
>
> "I'm using an ASUS A8V deluxe with 2GB RAM and no overclocking."
>
> If you are using 4 x 512MB of memory, the BIOS should have set
> the command rate to 2T. That setting is used to help the memory
> controller work with the heavy loading caused by four sticks of
> memory. You may also find that some adjustments to the other
> memory timings are required to get the computer to work properly.
>
> We haven't even gotten to the video card yet. The above two tests
> don't have much of any interaction with the video card. Once the
> CPU and memory are tuned up, you can accelerate testing on your
> video card, with a benchmark like 3DMark2001SE or equivalent.
> Benchmarks pass a lot of data through the video card hardware,
> and this could help identify if the actual GPU or memory on the
> video card has a problem. Accelerating the testing is important,
> since one hour of running 3DMark2001SE in demo mode, without
> crashing, is the equivalent of running for hundreds of hours
> with Microsoft word on the screen. Pumping a lot of data
> through the video card will prove that the card can be used
> for more mundane purposes.
>
> Powerstrip from entechtaiwan.com , can be used to check the
> configuration of the AGP interface. The Options item in the
> popup menu, will display how the hardware is set up, and will
> identify if you've installed chipset drivers, video card
> drivers, and DirectX properly. If something registers as
> being "disabled" in the Options screen, figure out why.
>
> There is a lot of testing you have to do, before you can make a
> blanket statement like the one you've just dropped on us.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Paul
Well said !