bill001g :
Even if you get both interfaces active it will likely always use the ethernet one. In the settings for the network devices there is a field that you tell it which has more priority. You pretty much have to choose. I suspect you could misconfigure it in some way so both are active but it still won't work because of how IP works. To make it simple I will ignore that addresses are natted. So if you were to go to your bank with the IP on your wireless it will be fine but not as fast as you like so you now send data on the ethernet also. The bank now received data from 2 different IP trying to access the same account and it will decide this is someone trying to hack the account and disconnect the session. It works similar with NAT but is to complex to describe here.
There is no simple way to do what you want. What you want to do is called port bonding. This allows a single IP to represent both connections. You need special software on both the PC and the router. The router software is the tough part. I would think you could try multilink PPP. Still the latency is very different between your 2 connection which causes massive problems for port bonding.
All right, but I don't need this much bandwidth to use the bank online, anyway. That would only truly benefit me when I'm trying to download a file in multiple parts from a public ftp server or uploading files at same time trying to download some...
I would like to know if, as an example, 2 parts of a file could be downloaded through Fast Ethernet and another 6 parts could be download through WiFi, many download manager already download files in multiple parts, but at least the ones I have tried are just using one active network interface to do so. I think the difference between this and your example is that these are connections being made in more than one interface at same time, but not data packets from a single connection being distributed between these interfaces.