If the damage is "like a scratch" on the soldermask, and "microscopic examination" confirms that the traces are intact; then the traces are not "completely cut through", then you have nothing to worry about, do you?
If, on the other hand, "microscopic examination" reveals that the traces are compromised, then you need to take remedial action of one kind or another.
THAT was the point of my response to you...you need to get some good light on the area, and inspect the traces under high magnification to determine the true condition of the potentially affected traces. "Microscopic examination will
confirm or
disprove this."
This will tell you positively
IF you are dealing with the worst case scenario (which is the case that I spoke of directly and requires action on your part);
or IF you are dealing with the better outcome that I left implied, where doing nothing is acceptable. (Was it actually necessary to say that, if the traces are not damaged, you don't need to do anything?)
You would be surprised at some of the boards that I've been handed to repair. What looks like nothing but just a bare whitening of the soldermask can hide a parted trace underneath; and, only after removing that section of the soldermask, is the break in the copper visible.
While "modern" PC boards do seem to have a thicker soldermask layer, these days, the traces are even thinner than they used to be in the 80's and 90', and thus, are more susceptible to damage than they used to be--just bending a PC board raises the risk of breaking multiple traces on the surface of the board on the convex side of the bend--or, even on an
internal layer.
A dropped screwdriver, landing on its business end, CAN cut a trace very easily, leaving no real evidence of catastrophic damage; and I have to admit that I have done as much, myself, back in a time when the traces were much easier to repair.
Funny. After all these years, that still bugs me now and then. ::: shrug :::