Hi, all.
Ok, I am getting a bit frustrated trying to figure out which power supply setup is better and I'm hoping someone on this forum can help.
I am looking for a new 400W-500W power supply for a P4 system that has 2 CD-ROMs, an IDE hard drive, an internal zip drive, and a video card that requires power (this alternates between the Radeon 9700 and the GeForce 6600). However, I cannot decide if a 12V dual rail or single rail power supply is better.
Researching this has been difficult because just when I think I have the answer, I read something (mostly Anandtech posts) that points to the opposite of what I was thinking. Does anyone have a definitive answer as to which is the better choice at this time? I can't find any articles on THG that speak to this issue.
From what I understand, the 12V dual rail is part of the new standard and is here to stay. The purpose of the dual rail is supposedly cleaner power to the chip and MB, which sounds good to me. Additionally, I have read that dual rails split up power between the MB/chip and other devices like PCI cards or hard drives. If one rail starts to get overloaded, the other rail can compensate. From what I gather, the 12V requirements have skyrocketed in the recent year due to the P4, serial hard drives, and power-hungry video cards. So, everyone says you have to have very good 12V rails and many claim that the dual rail does a better job of balancing voltages. And yet...
Some people (who sound like they know what they are talking about) are saying dual rail is at best an uneccessary improvement and, at worst, a danger to components. The reasons vary, but chief among them are the worry that video cards requiring power defeat the purpose of separating the chip/MB from the rest of the components and also that two smaller rails (say 14A and 16A) are not as good as one 30A rail. The latter argument claims that, although each rail is supposed to help out the other when approaching overload, in fact they do so rather poorly.
I really don't know what to believe. Further complicating this is information I have read that states many power supplies convert much of their 12V power from the 5V rail. I don't know how that would happen, but it makes me wonder, then, if a very strong 5V rail can make up for a weaker 12V rail.
Basically, I want to buy a PSU for $100 or less that has strong rail ratings in the appropriate places and will last me for some time to come. I just don't know what the appropriate ratings are anymore nor how important the dual rail specification is. Any thoughts on this matter are greatly appreciated.
Ok, I am getting a bit frustrated trying to figure out which power supply setup is better and I'm hoping someone on this forum can help.
I am looking for a new 400W-500W power supply for a P4 system that has 2 CD-ROMs, an IDE hard drive, an internal zip drive, and a video card that requires power (this alternates between the Radeon 9700 and the GeForce 6600). However, I cannot decide if a 12V dual rail or single rail power supply is better.
Researching this has been difficult because just when I think I have the answer, I read something (mostly Anandtech posts) that points to the opposite of what I was thinking. Does anyone have a definitive answer as to which is the better choice at this time? I can't find any articles on THG that speak to this issue.
From what I understand, the 12V dual rail is part of the new standard and is here to stay. The purpose of the dual rail is supposedly cleaner power to the chip and MB, which sounds good to me. Additionally, I have read that dual rails split up power between the MB/chip and other devices like PCI cards or hard drives. If one rail starts to get overloaded, the other rail can compensate. From what I gather, the 12V requirements have skyrocketed in the recent year due to the P4, serial hard drives, and power-hungry video cards. So, everyone says you have to have very good 12V rails and many claim that the dual rail does a better job of balancing voltages. And yet...
Some people (who sound like they know what they are talking about) are saying dual rail is at best an uneccessary improvement and, at worst, a danger to components. The reasons vary, but chief among them are the worry that video cards requiring power defeat the purpose of separating the chip/MB from the rest of the components and also that two smaller rails (say 14A and 16A) are not as good as one 30A rail. The latter argument claims that, although each rail is supposed to help out the other when approaching overload, in fact they do so rather poorly.
I really don't know what to believe. Further complicating this is information I have read that states many power supplies convert much of their 12V power from the 5V rail. I don't know how that would happen, but it makes me wonder, then, if a very strong 5V rail can make up for a weaker 12V rail.
Basically, I want to buy a PSU for $100 or less that has strong rail ratings in the appropriate places and will last me for some time to come. I just don't know what the appropriate ratings are anymore nor how important the dual rail specification is. Any thoughts on this matter are greatly appreciated.