Appearantly, recently, there are now L2 steppings and B2 steppings. The B2 being the Conroe cores with 2MB cache disabled and the L2 being the true Allendales.
The Allendale core seems to run cooler without those 2MB of useless cache, however, currently their overclocking ability is disputed.
The Conroe core is generally considered to be the superior overclocker, despite higher temps. Once again, there are no hard data backing this up. The only thing is that it is proven to be a solid OCer.
According to ripping.org, the E6300B2 seems to be the superior choice. The world record is a blistering 4442.74mhz compared to the L2's 3.5ghz.
On the flipside, despite being out for a VERY limited amount of time the E6400L2 has a WR of 4906.7mhz! This bested the B2's 4821.24mhz!
Granted, this speeds required vcores of upwards of 1.8, but it still shows that there is no concrete evidence showing one way or the other.
The E6400L2 seems to show off the potential of the cooler Allendale core, but the E6300 leaves much to be desired. Did they simply get an absurdly good chip or or it closer to the norm?
My take on the matter is that it seems there is relatively similar potential, except that the L2 has a lower temp, thusly allowing higher clocks. If all goes well, it shouldn't matter if you have an L2 or a B2, both hopefully will overclock well.
What do you think?
The Allendale core seems to run cooler without those 2MB of useless cache, however, currently their overclocking ability is disputed.
The Conroe core is generally considered to be the superior overclocker, despite higher temps. Once again, there are no hard data backing this up. The only thing is that it is proven to be a solid OCer.
According to ripping.org, the E6300B2 seems to be the superior choice. The world record is a blistering 4442.74mhz compared to the L2's 3.5ghz.
On the flipside, despite being out for a VERY limited amount of time the E6400L2 has a WR of 4906.7mhz! This bested the B2's 4821.24mhz!
Granted, this speeds required vcores of upwards of 1.8, but it still shows that there is no concrete evidence showing one way or the other.
The E6400L2 seems to show off the potential of the cooler Allendale core, but the E6300 leaves much to be desired. Did they simply get an absurdly good chip or or it closer to the norm?
My take on the matter is that it seems there is relatively similar potential, except that the L2 has a lower temp, thusly allowing higher clocks. If all goes well, it shouldn't matter if you have an L2 or a B2, both hopefully will overclock well.
What do you think?