e8400 can't get into windows at 3.9 and above!

johndoe3344

Distinguished
May 21, 2008
24
0
18,510
0
I managed to get ORTHOS stable for 7h 50 min at these settings:

CPU Ratio setting: auto
FSB frequency: 425
DRAM frequency: auto

CPU Voltage: 1.3625
CPU PLL: 1.8
FSB termination voltage: auto
DRAM voltage: 2.1
NB voltage: 1.4
SB voltage: auto

Loadline calibration: enabled

I wasn't really too happy about orthos failing, so I cranked the FSB down from 425 to 422, and am re-running orthos as I type right now.

Windows refuses to load at 3.96, 4.08, or 4.18 GHz, but this is with voltages < 1.37V -- I didn't dare bring it up over what I have it at already.

But 1.3625 seems really really high for a 3.8 GHz overclock. What do you guys suggest I do now? BTW, is 1.8v of CPU PLL safe? I never really read much about it.... I just kinda... set it there...


 

ausch30

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2007
2,210
0
19,790
1
These are my settings and the highest I've been able to get stable is 3.78. I'm still working on it but I'm starting to think I might have just gotten a bad chip (and you as well)


 

johndoe3344

Distinguished
May 21, 2008
24
0
18,510
0
I might be able to get to 3.89/3.9 if I increased the voltage to 1.4. Is it worth it?

What will I gain with 3.8 vs 3.9 GHz besides mere aesthetics in GPU-Z and bragging rights?
 

closed_deal

Distinguished
Oct 30, 2007
675
0
18,980
0
The jump from 3.8 to 4.0Ghz is minimal. Your SuperPi 1M times decrease's maybe less than a second and gaming performace is negligible. 4Ghz is more for personal satisfaction, even if it is only a boot and bench :).

I'm comfortable running mine at 1.45v for the 24/7 4.2Ghz (seems a bad chip in my eyes), it's not recommended but to be honest it's my money so i'll do as i wish.
 

ausch30

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2007
2,210
0
19,790
1
Mine is at 1.4 but without Loadline Calibration and after VDroop it's 1.36 Idle 1.34 Load. I've tried with and without Loadline Calibration and it really doesn't affect stability either way.
 

ausch30

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2007
2,210
0
19,790
1


I have a feeling that's what is going on a lot of the time. I consider stable 24hrs of Orthos but I think a lot of others just think that if it boots it's stable.
 

pcgamer12

Distinguished
May 1, 2008
1,089
0
19,280
0
I wouldn't go past 1.4v with a 45nm processor like yours, they tend to fry and will not work after that. 3.8 GHz is pretty good, why go to 4.0 GHz?
 

johndoe3344

Distinguished
May 21, 2008
24
0
18,510
0
So I take it that the general consensus is just to leave it at 3.8 GHz?

I guess I'll go working on fine-tuning my memory... maybe I can get it at 4/4/4/15... since it's rated at 1066 and I'm only using 425x2=850.
 

ausch30

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2007
2,210
0
19,790
1

I've read things that say both, some say leave it on some say turn it off and I really haven't found a difference between the two. With it on the system is stable at 1.36 and with it off it is stable at 1.4 (1.36 after droop).
 

50bmg

Distinguished
Nov 16, 2007
785
0
18,980
0
Why does the E8400 require higher voltage to get to 3.8G than the E7200? My E7200 runs 3.8G at 1.33v. Are they that different?
 

Noya

Distinguished
Jan 8, 2006
812
0
18,980
0


Twice the cache takes more juice.
 

Similar threads


TRENDING THREADS