Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (
More info?)
The answer was posted earlier this year:
From: David G. Imber (imber@maniform.com)
Subject: Re: Sanyo 4900 firmware
Original FormatNewsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Date: 2004-01-09 23:24:43 PST
On 8 Jan 2004 11:00:19 -0800, larryt510@hotmail.com (Larry Thomas) wrote:
>David G. Imber <imber@maniform.com> wrote in message
news:<b6tpvvsa5p9tnp5sre1b9krtc6p37p81cv@4ax.com>...
>> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:51:34 -0800, "LC" <lcoop96@nospamhotmail.com> wrote:
>>
..
>>
>> I'm on a friendly basis with my local SPCS store techs, who are
>> very competent. They'll simply say to me "you don't need this upgrade". One
>> recent upgrade addressed a problem with echo in certain areas. I didn't
>> need that one either. My 4900 is on 1.057 and my wife's is on 1.058.
>> Quality of operation is indistinguishable.
>>
>> DGI
>
>
>Interesting. I didn't think 1.058 ever exsisted.
Forgive me - I just checked. I'm on 1.056 and she's on 1.057. 1.057
was the one that purportedly addressed the echo, and I didn't upgrade
because I had no such problem. Hers is a refurb/replacement that came with
1.057 installed. And you're right, there was no 1.058. I had my numbers
mixed up. 1.059 is indeed the one that addressed roaming problems in
Virginia.