Edit: Nevermind...

[apesoccer]

<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2362" target="_new">Anandtech</A>

I thought 02 (Win XP) could only run 2 processors...apparently not the case. Perhaps you can purchase XP with more licenses for cpus, or something along those lines?


Current machines running F@H:
Athlons: [64 3500+][64 3000+][2500+][2000+][1.3x1][366]
Pentiums: [X 3.0][P4 2.4x5][P4 1.4]

It's not worth saying unless it takes a really long time to say!<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by apesoccer on 03/02/05 03:58 PM.</EM></FONT></P>

 

[apesoccer]

Hrm...could you give me a link to where hyperthreading isn't considered a processor by windows? I thought i remembered reading that it was. I'm looking now...as well.

Current machines running F@H:
Athlons: [64 3500+][64 3000+][2500+][2000+][1.3x1][366]
Pentiums: [X 3.0][P4 2.4x5][P4 1.4]

It's not worth saying unless it takes a really long time to say!

 

[Zoron]

<b>Home</b> Edition has no support for multiple processors, but it does support Hyperthreading.

As for <b>Homie</b> Edition... well we'll have to check with tha gangstas.



<font color=red> If you design software that is fool-proof, only a fool will want to use it. </font color=red>

 

[apesoccer]

Well...i found on ms's site that xp home recognizes 2 cpus if the cpu has hyperthreading enabled...so that pretty much ends the discussion...Oh well...And i was so excited too. =/ <looks around sheepishly>

Text smily Fanboy right here <---- =P

Current machines running F@H:
Athlons: [64 3500+][64 3000+][2500+][2000+][1.3x1][366]
Pentiums: [X 3.0][P4 2.4x5][P4 1.4]

It's not worth saying unless it takes a really long time to say!

 

[Guest]

That's funny. I'm glad I opted for pro and not homo

<font color=green> Woohoo!! I am officially an <b> Enthusiast </b>!! </font color=green>
<i> <font color=red> One new Firefox fan </font color=red> </i>