News Eight-Core Tiger Lake-H Processor Spotted

nofanneeded

Respectable
Sep 29, 2019
1,562
252
2,090
52
Sadly, there are not much notebooks options to choose from when it comes to AMD CPU ... even If you find it with RTX 2060 the screen will be garbage . and if you want RTX 2070super/2080super good luck with it.

Intel Dominates the Notebook market.
 

JayNor

Commendable
May 31, 2019
329
46
1,710
0
Some articles say this TGL-H chip will be paired with Intel's Xe-HPG enthusiast gaming GPU. For example, the notebookcheck article from 9/17 shows a photo of an mxm DG2 (Xe-HPG) GPU board with gddr6. The TGL-H is also stated to have 20 lanes of pcie4 (up from 4 on TGL-U).
 

jgraham11

Distinguished
Jan 15, 2010
52
18
18,535
0
AMD's 4000 line of CPUs completely destroy Intel's in virtually all multi-core tests and basically ties in single threaded workloads.
The fact that Toms is referencing Userbenchmark is deplorable, as Userbenchmark is almost universally known as Intel Shills!

Look at the ratings of the 5900x and 5950x: Despite that every hardware reviewer that I've seen (Paul's harware, Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus, Jarod's Tech, PC benchmarks, Hardware Cannuck, etc) has said that these processors are vastly superior to what Intel is offering and yet on Userbenchmark the Intel 10900k is better than both.

Userbenchmark - the only ones who have the 10900k better than AMD 5000 series

Another example of Toms being an Intel shill... Userbenchmark should be taken with a grain of salt... Next they'll use Bapco Sysmark in their benchmarks again...
 

spongiemaster

Estimable
Dec 12, 2019
1,803
906
3,560
0
AMD's 4000 line of CPUs completely destroy Intel's in virtually all multi-core tests and basically ties in single threaded workloads.
The fact that Toms is referencing Userbenchmark is deplorable, as Userbenchmark is almost universally known as Intel Shills!

Look at the ratings of the 5900x and 5950x: Despite that every hardware reviewer that I've seen (Paul's harware, Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus, Jarod's Tech, PC benchmarks, Hardware Cannuck, etc) has said that these processors are vastly superior to what Intel is offering and yet on Userbenchmark the Intel 10900k is better than both.

Userbenchmark - the only ones who have the 10900k better than AMD 5000 series

Another example of Toms being an Intel shill... Userbenchmark should be taken with a grain of salt... Next they'll use Bapco Sysmark in their benchmarks again...
The point of this article is to inform people that Tiger Lake H is out in the wild and being tested. The article makes no reference to the scores and no one cares what they are from an early engineering sample.
 

shady28

Distinguished
Jan 29, 2007
181
73
18,690
5
AMD's 4000 line of CPUs completely destroy Intel's in virtually all multi-core tests and basically ties in single threaded workloads.
The fact that Toms is referencing Userbenchmark is deplorable, as Userbenchmark is almost universally known as Intel Shills!

Look at the ratings of the 5900x and 5950x: Despite that every hardware reviewer that I've seen (Paul's harware, Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus, Jarod's Tech, PC benchmarks, Hardware Cannuck, etc) has said that these processors are vastly superior to what Intel is offering and yet on Userbenchmark the Intel 10900k is better than both.

Userbenchmark - the only ones who have the 10900k better than AMD 5000 series

Another example of Toms being an Intel shill... Userbenchmark should be taken with a grain of salt... Next they'll use Bapco Sysmark in their benchmarks again...

Best scores for top SKU 4900HS on geekbench single core are around 1200, mostly less.

Best scores for top sku 1185G7 Tiger Lake -U is over 1600 while typical is in the 1500s.

So Tiger Lake already 'completely destroys' (using your words) AMD 4000 series laptop SKUs in single core, even compared to the rare special release 4900HS.

It's no big surprise that the 4 core tiger falls behind in multi-core vs 8-core 4000 series, but it isn't behind as much as core count would indicate. It matches and usually beats the 6 core 4600U in multi-thread.

It is getting single core comparable to the 5600X Zen 3 desktop. 5800X and higher have higher clocks, and can get ~5% more on single core than the Tiger Lake - U laptop chip....
 
Aug 11, 2020
32
4
35
0
AMD's 4000 line of CPUs completely destroy Intel's in virtually all multi-core tests and basically ties in single threaded workloads.
The fact that Toms is referencing Userbenchmark is deplorable, as Userbenchmark is almost universally known as Intel Shills!

Look at the ratings of the 5900x and 5950x: Despite that every hardware reviewer that I've seen (Paul's harware, Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus, Jarod's Tech, PC benchmarks, Hardware Cannuck, etc) has said that these processors are vastly superior to what Intel is offering and yet on Userbenchmark the Intel 10900k is better than both.

Userbenchmark - the only ones who have the 10900k better than AMD 5000 series

Another example of Toms being an Intel shill... Userbenchmark should be taken with a grain of salt... Next they'll use Bapco Sysmark in their benchmarks again...
funny how you say userbenchmark are intel shills while being an even bigger amd shill
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS