Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (
More info?)
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:29:21 -0500, "Douglas" <.> wrote:
>I have an Epson 960 Photo,it lasted 54.5 weeks before it went belly up.It
>had constant clogging since day 1.It could not even go 24 hours between uses
>without clogging.It finally clogged so bad it would not clear,even when a
>printer repair place worked on it!Since it was a couple of weeks past the
>warranty period,Epson said "too bad"!By the way,I bought all my ink straight
>from Epsons website!I now have an R800,it has been much better.I would not
>have bought another Epson,but I need cd printing capability.My Epson 2200
>went bad within 2 weeks of the 960.Epsons repair center gave me a $400+
>quote for repairs on the 2 printers.
>"Don Pyeatt" <gdp@cowtown.net> wrote in message
>news:10m7mf4r14hg7f4@corp.supernews.com...
>> Am considering purchasing a refurbed 960. Any comments about this
>> printer appreciated.
>>
>> Don
>>
>>
>
I have had an EPSON 960 Photo Printer for about 2 years now and it is
an absolutely fantastic photo printer. I have had no clogging problems
whatsoever (always turn the printer off when not using it from the
printer). I always print through Adobe Photoshop using the EPSON
supplied ICC profiles for the specific paper that I am printing on and
the results are outstanding. I prefer to print on either EPSON Matte
Paper Heavyweight or EPSON Premium Luster Paper rather than EPSON
Premium Gloss Paper. The CD printing feature works fine and the roll
paper function works best with A4 Premium Luster paper (8.3") rather
than 4" Premium Glossy paper.
I paid $349 for my printer and it is well worth it. If you can get a
refurbished unit for less than this, I certainly recommend it.