EQ2: healer aggro changes likely

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

Posted yesterday by Moorgard in the official Sony forums:


"Yes, it turns out there is a code issue that causes hate to be
assigned to the recipient of the ward/reactive heal rather than
the caster. In other words, it's not that druid heals are bugged;
they are, in fact, the only heals (aside from instant-resolve
ones) assigning their hate correctly.

Wards and reactives do generate hate on their initial cast, just
not over subsequent heals like they were meant to.

Now, this revelation probably causes some shamans and clerics
concern, because they see us fixing this issue and the result
being that they get pounded on. After talking to designers about
it, we realize that a huge change to healing aggro probably isn't
needed, just a more equitable middle ground.

We're going to evaluate the way hate is generated and will likely
make it so that wards and reactives generate somewhat more hate
than they currently do, and probably make regens generate somewhat
less. We don't want any type of healer to be shunned because they
draw more aggro when healing for the same amount of health. We'll
also take a look at taunt skills to make sure they're behaving as
we intend them to.

Keep in mind that healing, like nuking, shouldn't be done with
impunity. A healer needs to play with strategy, just as much as
any other class. The priest who pounds the heal keys without
thinking about it will take a beating, just like the careless mage
or the thoughtless scout or the witless fighter. Because as sure
as the sun came up this morning, at the first hint of a healing
aggro change in the update notes there will be countless "SOE made
healing useless!" threads, despite the fact that skilled players
will continue to play their priest classes just fine."


http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=spellart&message.id=28528#M28528
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

In article <421A8D5F.5030001@gmailspamthis.dotcom>,
Paul Botts <paulnospam@spamlessgmail.comm> wrote:
>assigned to the recipient of the ward/reactive heal rather than

What's a reactive heal?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

"the wharf rat" <wrat@panix.com> wrote in message
news:cve74n$dmv$1@reader2.panix.com...
> In article <421A8D5F.5030001@gmailspamthis.dotcom>,
> Paul Botts <paulnospam@spamlessgmail.comm> wrote:
> >assigned to the recipient of the ward/reactive heal rather than
>
> What's a reactive heal?
>
A person is warded witha reactive heal, they get heal then they reheal from
that rather than the usual heals of waiting for the person to take damage
and then casting.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

On 2005-02-22, Paul Botts <pauldotbotts@gmailspamthis.dotcom> wrote:
> We're going to evaluate the way hate is generated and will likely
> make it so that wards and reactives generate somewhat more hate
> than they currently do, and probably make regens generate somewhat
> less. We don't want any type of healer to be shunned because they
> draw more aggro when healing for the same amount of health. We'll
> also take a look at taunt skills to make sure they're behaving as
> we intend them to.

Aghhhh! I play tank in our group as a warden. Dont do it! Its hard
enough keeping aggro as it is. No! No I say!

> Keep in mind that healing, like nuking, shouldn't be done with
> impunity. A healer needs to play with strategy, just as much as

Exactly! More aggro! MORE!

> any other class. The priest who pounds the heal keys without
> thinking about it will take a beating, just like the careless mage
> or the thoughtless scout or the witless fighter. Because as sure
> as the sun came up this morning, at the first hint of a healing
> aggro change in the update notes there will be countless "SOE made
> healing useless!" threads, despite the fact that skilled players
> will continue to play their priest classes just fine."

nonononononono!

>
>
> http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=spellart&message.id=28528#M28528
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

"the wharf rat" <wrat@panix.com> wrote in message
news:cve74n$dmv$1@reader2.panix.com...

>>assigned to the recipient of the ward/reactive heal rather than

> What's a reactive heal?

All healers have a distinct type of heal that helps define their class.
Shamans have Wards, Druids have Regens, and Clerics have Reactives. All 3
healer archetypes also have instant heals, but these are apart from their
class defining heals.

Reactive heals are like little health packages placed on a player that sit
there and then trigger when the player takea damage. They are "reactive" to
the damage taken, and act without intervention by the healer. So, when you
see a tank take major damage but instantly heal, it's often because of the
Cleric's reactives.

--
Redbeard, the Treasure Hunter
<Veritas>
Dwarven Mystic and Alchemist
Loyal Citizen of the Antonia Bayle
Current resident of the Willow Wood, City of Qeynos
http://veritas.everquest2guilds.com

Descendant of the Elder Winterfury Thunderwolf
<Resolution, Retired>
Barbarian Prophet of The Tribunal
Retired Citizen of Firiona Vie
 

TRENDING THREADS