Experimental radiator \build log!!!

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

toolmaker_03

Honorable
Mar 26, 2012
2,650
0
12,960
well here are the radiators, my problem is the configuration of them, simply too many possibilities, so if you could find the time to give your opinions, I would really appreciate it.
I also need advice on a type of shroud for the radiators, the purpose is to inshore good air flow through the radiator.
and lastly how to attach the fans to the radiators?



all advice is welcome and thank you

 
Solution
I don't use a flow meter, never have, never will.

Having a picture of a flow meter does nothing to support a finding, especially when you cannot be 100% conclusive that it is reading correctly or you are accurately converting what is being reported. Does the flow meter registering on the pump without restriction show a flow rate that is close to the rated flow of the pump with your conversion?

If so, great, but if so, you're still running lower than 1.0 gpm on your loop, meaning your delta-T MUST be offset to calculate your cooling potential. Meaning - you have to over-rad to accomplish the same cooling ability that you could achieve with a higher flow. Adding cost of 3x 360 radiators ($60, example) starts to get expensive...
yes, I know it may not seem as if I am doing any research, but I am, I really am, I guess I am scared of getting the wrong parts, and having to buy what I should have the first time around, main reason for the questions is that I kind of would like this build, to be the best that it can be, and I don't mind getting the right parts for that. quite possibility in a couple of years, I will be building a i5 2500K system, but that is not in the budget for today. today it's the crosshair II system, and making it bigger, meaner, and stronger, than it has ever been before, well you know what I mean.
 
In that case I'd say definitely the Quad, more O/c headroom means longevity, the two extra cores are unlikely to be used for games anytime soon so grab as high a PII as you can, 975/980 would be ideal, 965 just as valid but a higher initial binning means better chip basically
Moto
 
will the 980 work, I really can't find anything to support it, other than the fact that 1066 memory will work, and it will fit in the AM2+ socket, but will the board Bios understand it? or does this even matter with today's boards and processors?
 
Now, allow me explain this, why I thank it might work, I have a Asus Nanos board with a 6000+ CPU in it. the Bios does not recognize it properly it says it is a 5800 simpron running at 3 GHz, ok I can deal with that. I hooked a 8800 ultra card to it and the bios did not know this card either, but it read the memory correctly at 763 MB, so ok I can deal with that to. When you enter the OS with the proper drivers installed the OS understood them properly, so I guess what I am asking is that, if this is common in the newer motherboards to understand tech that they where never designed to?
 
ok so let's do a break down for this build so far ----

Asus Crosshair II with a 980 processor, OCZ 1150 flex memory, GTX 480, and 2 raptor 74 Gig HHD. That's 13 blocks, 7 rads, 2 ress, and 2 pumps. that's a lot of hardware. any ideas on how it will perform?
 
well this board does have a crazy switch on it for the processor voltage, and I do plan to cool the processor with some kind of chiller/cooler system. so that I can play with this feature, for what are switches for if not to play with?
 
well I have read that the GTX 480 when clocked to 900 GPU and 1800 on the shadier memory, that the card uses 418 watts, so that is 836 watts total right, if there both clocked, and the mother board under a massive clock of 4.6 GHz to 4.8 GHz on the CPU is pulling up to 538 watts total and I haven't seen a 1500 watt able to cover everything. but maybe i am missing somthing?