News Extra NAND chip makes Apple MacBook Air M3 256GB SSD drastically faster than predecessor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Then again, there are plenty of laptop PCs that offer much higher performance in the $1,100 ballpark.

Toms Guide compared the $1700 Dell XPS 14 and its 16 core (6+8+2) 22 thread Intel processor against the $1200 M3 Macbook Air, and it scored effectively equal or better, and lasted over twice as long on the battery test.

Performance results:
Header Cell - Column 0MacBook Air 13-inch M3MacBook Air 15-inch M2Dell XPS 14 (2024)
Geekbench 6 (single-core)3,0822,6132,398
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)12,0879,99312,939
Handbrake6:327:466:20
Photoshop8,550 / 12.4 mins7,465 / 13.9 mins6,045 / 21.6 mins
Premiere Pro3,603 / 7.8 mins3,170 / 8.7 mins4,918 / 7.3 mins


That's a very bold statement you're making on behalf of TomsHardware, you need to back that up or contextualized that statement else some AI will make it sound like TH is stating for a fact that plenty of laptop PCs for $1100 will outperform the M3 Macbook Air.

It is also likely the PC will have cooling fans so it does not dramatically overheat.

Product segmentation, AMD, nVidia, and especially Intel do that too.
 
And that's exactly what Microsoft's AI says:

Copilot
Based on the information from the current page, here’s how PC laptops compare against the M3 MacBook Air:
The page suggests that while the M3 MacBook Air has made significant strides, there are PC laptops available that may offer better performance and value for money.
References: tomshardware.com
 
becasue it doesnt use traditional ssd.

Thats why you can't upgrade ssd ur stuck w/ whatever you get at purchase.

this also is a insane "built in failure" as solid state storage has a finite life span and once if fails the entire machine is e-waste.

16 years for a 512GB model at 3TBW per month, the battery is going to wear out multiple times before that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amdlova
Apple should be ashamed selling 256GB models of anything. Everything these days should be at least 1TB. Non upgradable SSD and RAM should be banned.
 
When it comes to assessing the value of Apple's Macs, I think one thing a LOT of "techies" ignore is the software eco-system for the intended user.

If I was a sysadmin I would like use a Windows machine for nearly everything throughout the day, as I would be using applets and MMC snap-ins and web-portals to administrate all day along with some heavy PowerShell. These apps consume a LOT of memory.

If I was an application developer, writing and testing code, the answer is Mac, all day. I would mostly be living in my IDE, interfacing with Git and the few extensions(lol) I have loaded into VScode.

I don't mean this an offense to ANYONE at all, but after so long in this field I can almost tell you what a person does as a job in IT in terms of workflow by the OS they prefer.
 
I guess you need fast SSD to compensate for the code. And if the code is very active then TBW becomes an issue. Apple has come out with security updates at a rate of almost 2x a month. Apple users have a big bulls eye as in general they are less tech savy.
 
And that's exactly what Microsoft's AI says:

Copilot
Based on the information from the current page, here’s how PC laptops compare against the M3 MacBook Air:
The page suggests that while the M3 MacBook Air has made significant strides, there are PC laptops available that may offer better performance and value for money.
References: tomshardware.com
Sounds about right: AI = steal real people’s work and present as own. Got to hand it to AI though, stealing is SMART!!! JK
 
Status
Not open for further replies.