It seems some benchmarks(?) of the next-gen Pascals have been uploaded on WCCFTech:
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-pascal-3dmark-11-entries-spotted/
These benches seem fake to me.
If you visit the first link that shows up, you'll see that the 12K mark is of a 970 with a mid Haswell i5(the 4570).
If you use a i3-2100 with a 980Ti class card, that's stupid, since the 980Ti will get bottlenecked, and show sub-970 performance(as it's clearly doing here).
The other two, which are with a i5-6500, also barely reach the 970, and the spec figures also seem photoshopped.
Any bets that it's just a R9 390? If it's not, it could just be a Pascal X60.
If you ask me, this seems like a clickbait stunt by WCCFTech to lure users to click on the other links about Pascals in the article.
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-pascal-3dmark-11-entries-spotted/
These benches seem fake to me.
If you visit the first link that shows up, you'll see that the 12K mark is of a 970 with a mid Haswell i5(the 4570).
If you use a i3-2100 with a 980Ti class card, that's stupid, since the 980Ti will get bottlenecked, and show sub-970 performance(as it's clearly doing here).
The other two, which are with a i5-6500, also barely reach the 970, and the spec figures also seem photoshopped.
Any bets that it's just a R9 390? If it's not, it could just be a Pascal X60.
If you ask me, this seems like a clickbait stunt by WCCFTech to lure users to click on the other links about Pascals in the article.