Primary issue i see with virtually every case fan, is that in the very center of the fan you have a dead zone, where air just hovers. that dead zone is butted up against our heatsinks, and we create an inefficient space where the fan meets the heatsink. This is the problem.
120 to 80mm adapter http://www.sharkacomputers.com/fanad8012fan.html
This adapter takes the CFM's of a 120mm fan, and increases the air velocity by passing it through a smooth cone down to 80mm.
Thinking like a rocket scientist (you know we all are), you could butt two of these adapters together at the 80mm end, creating ><.
Fan >< Heatsink
Benefits of this mod include well distributed air with no dead zone on all fins of the heatsink. and thus the ability to use air more effectively, meaning you could use a slower/quieter fan to have the same effective cooling as a higher speed fan.
So, anyone have the materials to try this out to scientifically determine if temperatures increase or decrease on either a tower style heatsink, or a downdraft style?
Someone with a smoke machine and a web cam to bench test the theory would be just as cool. Any takers?
120 to 80mm adapter http://www.sharkacomputers.com/fanad8012fan.html
This adapter takes the CFM's of a 120mm fan, and increases the air velocity by passing it through a smooth cone down to 80mm.
Thinking like a rocket scientist (you know we all are), you could butt two of these adapters together at the 80mm end, creating ><.
Fan >< Heatsink
Benefits of this mod include well distributed air with no dead zone on all fins of the heatsink. and thus the ability to use air more effectively, meaning you could use a slower/quieter fan to have the same effective cooling as a higher speed fan.
So, anyone have the materials to try this out to scientifically determine if temperatures increase or decrease on either a tower style heatsink, or a downdraft style?
Someone with a smoke machine and a web cam to bench test the theory would be just as cool. Any takers?