Find the Bottleneck in my Video Editing System

Doug Ferguson

Reputable
Aug 15, 2014
4
0
4,510
Hello,

I built the system below after some heavy research and now have a very big computer. I own a video production company and use Adobe's Creative Cloud 2015 Premiere and After Effects on a daily basis. The system, I feel, should be faster than it is but I don't know what testing tools or what to look for in the one's I've tried to determine where my system lacks. I'm currently working on a project where I have to edit 12 streams of HD video from various camera formats. See the specs below and any advice on what components I might swap out or configuration I could try to make life better.

My computer:

CPU: Intel Core i7-3930K 3.2GHz 6-Core Processor
CPU Cooler: Corsair H100i GTX 70.7 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler
Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS SSI CEB LGA2011 Motherboard
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws Z Series 64GB (8 x 8GB) DDR3-2133 Memory (64 Gb)
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB Video Card
Power Supply: Corsair Professional 1050W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply

My Storage is configured as such:

C: Drive (Programs Only):
1 x Samsung 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive

P: Drive (Video Projects, and all the Library files like pictures, music, documents...)
8 x Hitachi Ultrastar 7K3000 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive
in a Raid 30 connected to an Areca ARC-1882

Z: Drive (Cache Drive for Premiere's cache previews and temp files and for exporting videos)
2 x Samsung 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive
in a Raid 0 connected to an Areca ARC-1882

I have other drives for backups and archive storage but those don't effect the editing workflow. Premiere just doesn't seem to perform like it should. I have spent hours on the phone with them trying different versions to try to make it edit properly.

Thanks for your help.

Doug


 
I would open resource monitor in Windows and work as normal, then check resource monitor after it slows down and if your CPU, RAM or disk usage is consistently at 100% that's probably the bottleneck.

EDIT: It also could be network usage however this seems less likely to me.
 
Yes, I am trying to edit all the streams together in a multi-cam sequence. I don't have any effects or color grading at this point, just the raw files. I have many different camera formats:
Sony EX3 and EX1 (.MP4)
Canon DSLR's (.mov)
Other cameras with (.mts)

I did a Crystal Disk Mark test on the drives.
The Production drive (Raid 30 with 8 3Tb Hitachi drives)
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 675.546 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 1060.333 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 49.762 MB/s
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 78.501 MB/s
Sequential Read (T= 1) : 1100.054 MB/s
Sequential Write (T= 1) : 287.328 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 77.592 MB/s
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 3.264 MB/s

Here is the Cache Drive SSD as a Pass Through Disk:
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 177.785 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 754.454 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 363.910 MB/s [ 88845.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 323.220 MB/s [ 78911.1 IOPS]
Sequential Read (T= 1) : 1072.380 MB/s
Sequential Write (T= 1) : 925.886 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 110.147 MB/s [ 26891.4 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 104.604 MB/s

Here is the Cache Drive SSD as 2 x 512Gb Raid 0:
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 1470.751 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 896.176 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 286.814 MB/s
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 219.255 MB/s
Sequential Read (T= 1) : 1333.875 MB/s
Sequential Write (T= 1) : 839.268 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 107.761 MB/s
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 88.941 MB/s

It appears that the Raid 0 of the SSD drives are faster. So, I'm still at a loss. What part of the system needs updated to accomplish 12 streams?