First PC build!

May 15, 2018
4
0
10
Hello, I’m in the process of picking parts for my first ever pc! Mainly for gaming and streaming, my budget is 1000$ if anybody has any builds in mind it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
 

$1000 Usd or another currency?

 

Yes 1000$ usd :)
 
Update ur mobo in a local shop :

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 5 2600X 3.6GHz 6-Core Processor ($209.99 @ Newegg)
Motherboard: MSI - B350 TOMAHAWK PLUS ATX AM4 Motherboard ($81.98 @ Newegg)
Memory: Team - T-Force Delta RGB 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory ($169.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Crucial - MX500 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($69.99 @ B&H)
Storage: Seagate - Barracuda 2TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($54.99 @ Amazon)
Video Card: Asus - Radeon RX 580 4GB Dual Video Card ($269.99 @ B&H)
Case: NZXT - S340 (Black/Red) ATX Mid Tower Case ($49.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Power Supply: SeaSonic - EVO Edition 620W 80+ Bronze Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($44.99 @ Newegg)
Operating System: Microsoft - Windows 10 Home OEM 64-bit ($94.89 @ OutletPC)
Total: $1046.80
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-05-16 01:10 EDT-0400
 
Solution
As i said in your other post, i suggest you this build:

For streaming while gaming you need more cores so i suggested you this build:

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz 6-Core Processor ($175.79 @ SuperBiiz)
Motherboard: ASRock - AB350M Pro4 Micro ATX AM4 Motherboard ($59.99 @ Newegg)
Memory: G.Skill - Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3200 Memory ($164.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: ADATA - Ultimate SU800 128GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($37.99 @ Amazon)
Storage: Hitachi - Deskstar 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($37.00 @ Newegg Marketplace)
Video Card: Asus - Radeon RX 580 8GB ROG STRIX Video Card ($369.99 @ Amazon)
Case: Cougar - MX330 ATX Mid Tower Case ($24.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Power Supply: Cooler Master - MasterWatt 550W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply ($45.66 @ Amazon)
Total: $916.40
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-05-16 12:19 EDT-0400
 
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 5 2600 3.4GHz 6-Core Processor ($189.99 @ Amazon)
Motherboard: MSI - X470 GAMING PLUS ATX AM4 Motherboard ($129.99 @ Amazon)
Memory: Team - Dark 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory ($159.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Toshiba - OCZ TR200 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($57.99 @ Amazon)
Storage: Western Digital - Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($43.90 @ OutletPC)
Video Card: EVGA - GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB SC GAMING Video Card ($229.99 @ Amazon)
Case: Deepcool - TESSERACT SW RED ATX Mid Tower Case ($29.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Power Supply: SeaSonic - EVO Edition 620W 80+ Bronze Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($59.99 @ Newegg)
Operating System: Microsoft - Windows 10 Home OEM 64-bit ($97.99 @ Other World Computing)
Total: $999.82
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-05-16 13:00 EDT-0400
 
MERGED QUESTION
Question from jtproductions12 : "Wanting to build my first pc capable of streaming and gaming with a 1000$ budget!"







 

AMD cpu's are bad value kid. Every review that i read before i built my Pc agreed. AMD is now a gpu not a cpu company. Intel cpus are better and more value that AMD <o/
 


Completely untrue since Ryzen launch. This coming from someone using a 6700k.
 


18 months ago, you might have been correct.
Ryzen has changed the CPU landscape.
 


AcHboXp.png
 
1 more thing : is overclocking for gaming in ryzen 2600X even worth it? The stock boost frequency is higher than all core oc you can achieve. So why spend so much on an X470 board? I know, it's blasphemy when you are paying for an overclockable cpu and mobo 😛

Also, the 1600 made sense cuz u can oc to the same level of 1600X with a bit higher vcore. But the 2600X changes that completely. With the included stock cooler, I think 2600X makes more sense than the 2600.
 


You say that *AFTER* recommending a generation old CPU. I suggest reading up on current benchmarks and performance and then suggesting that again.
 

I love how ignorant everyone is being. AMD claims that Ryzen is faster but i have used both Intel and AMD (The newer ones) and i can tell inconstantly that the Intel cores run Windows and any games that i play faster than the AMD cpus. You AMD fans can have your opinion and back your favourite but i am not gonna believe the * you are trying to tell me. I know from experiment that the Intel cores run faster no matter what the * AMD claims.
Also although the ryzen cores may run some and i mean SOME applications faster, 98.9% of software does not take advantage of 8 cores so it ends up being slower
https://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/615216/which-processor-best-intel-amd/
 


Language, please.
Thanks.
 

Yes dad, sorry
 


So you come in and call everyone fanboys, and then cherry pick an article from almost a year and a half ago that doesn't even make your point.

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-review,5571.html

Current article, current products, and current prices.

And no, I don't believe for 1 second you built competing systems and sat there and noticed games or programs "running faster" Gaming wise without watching an FPS counter you would never see the difference. Software wise without benchmarking specific tasks you wouldn't either, and heck the AMD is often faster.

So again, "AMD CPUs are bad value, kid" is one of the most technologically ignorant things you can say.
 
So according to the link you posted...they are actually quite close in performance.
Intel wins in some areas, Ryzen in others.

That doesn't seem to translate into "AMD cpu's are bad value kid." (your words above).

It's funny.
Just today, Tom's Hardware has been labeled a shill for Intel and AMD.

Guess that just shows people's personal preferences that they can't seem to get past.

Just FYI, lest you think I personally am a shill for AMD...all my current house systems are Intel. I'd have no problem recommending an AMD system for someone buying/building today.
OR an Intel.

In fact, I'm building a Ryzen system for a guy next week. It could easily have been an Intel system.
 


I have a rig that runs an Intel 6700K and an AMD Ryzen. Both rigs are pretty strong performers. If this were strictly gaming I would say that yes Intel is the superior CPU. But after seeing the 2nd generation Ryzen benchmarks this is the closest we've actually come to having a serious competitor to Intel in years. What you said was absolutely true in the days of FX and I still wouldn't touch the FX series with a 10 foot pole, but now that Ryzen and Ryzen 2 are out that claim has diminished a lot.
 

There you go again with you AMD fan club You want a recent review. This is the most recent article that i can find that comes from a legit place. Any article form this place can have anyone say random stuff as proved by the crap coming from you
http://www.trustedreviews.com/guide/best-cpu-for-gaming
Also kid if you are gonna call me technologically ignorant then get a degree in IT and not in "insulting"
(Yes i realise that i insult people alot, apologies)