Ninjawithagun :
Fake. Wait for real reviews please. You can down vote me all you want, it just means I'm right.
No, it doesn't mean you are right, it just means you are clueless to the ways and means in which reviewers get their data. Clearly you have no understanding of the fact that bona fide reviewers receive review samples ahead of release times and are generally prohibited, through NDA agreements, from releasing results of testing before a specific date which correlates with the actual launch. The fact that they compared their results with an older Intel CPU is likely due to the fact that THAT particular reviewer likely did not have a newer SKU to put through the paces of a similar lab environment or that the closest thing they had already tested was the 6700k and they did not want to have to go through the entire process of obtaining and testing something newer just to offer a specific test result compared to another specific test result.
A lot of these reviewers are independent, without major backing/funding, and cannot simply go by hardware for testing in order to make everybody happy. They test with what they have or what they are sent in the way of review samples. If you don't like it, I'd suggest you do your own testing if you think you are capable of doing so. Having hardware early, whether the review is a good measure or is realistic, or not, does not mean it is fake. Doesn't mean it isn't either, but in this case, you certainly don't have the information necessary to say that it is. Pffft.