First Samsung Galaxy S4 Image Leaked; No Home Button

Status
Not open for further replies.

ajrm

Distinguished
Feb 1, 2012
37
0
18,530
Bated Breath...!!! looks a little bare at the bottom ..

hopefully kills the iPhone once and for all..
 

ajrm

Distinguished
Feb 1, 2012
37
0
18,530
Kudos Zak ... for all the stick you've been taking.. most of it uncalled for....
Proper news this...
 

InvalidError

Titan
Moderator
Using my N7 for a couple of months taught me one thing: I'd love to have hardware buttons for Home or disable/enable the on-screen system keys because I accidentally activate them often enough to become a significant irritant.
 

vikeor

Distinguished
Jan 23, 2012
3
0
18,510
Looks like a fake. The phone looks 2D and the flash reflection looks too real. Paper doesnt reflect light like that.
 

dns7950

Distinguished
Jan 17, 2009
111
0
18,690
[citation][nom]vikeor[/nom]Looks like a fake. The phone looks 2D and the flash reflection looks too real. Paper doesnt reflect light like that.[/citation]
It's a picture on a monitor, not paper.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Meh waiting on the Galaxy Note 3 next Summer with a 6.3 inch screen.
 

soo-nah-mee

Distinguished
Feb 5, 2009
564
0
18,990
[citation][nom]ajrm[/nom]looks a little bare at the bottom[/citation]It does, but I've always disliked the physical home button on my S3. I'd much rather have the home button be capacitive.
Give me a dedicated camera button though!
 

ohim

Distinguished
Feb 10, 2009
1,195
0
19,360
[citation][nom]soldier2013[/nom]Meh waiting on the Galaxy Note 3 next Summer with a 6.3 inch screen.[/citation]
each time i read posts like this i always think at "meh ... waiting for Galaxy S8/Iphone22 5 years from now with 3D LED and a virtual vagina" no point in looking at half an year away to be realesed stuff... they are already outdated.
 

wemakeourfuture

Distinguished
Dec 20, 2011
601
0
18,980
[citation][nom]ajrm[/nom]Bated Breath...!!! looks a little bare at the bottom .. hopefully kills the iPhone once and for all..[/citation]

I think you don't even understand both the non-tangible and tangible reasons why someone has a higher marginal utility for an iPhone over a Galaxy.
 

tntom

Distinguished
Sep 1, 2001
356
0
18,780
No physical buttons yeah! Hopefully the rear speaker will be better than the original Galaxy S this time that one was fantastic. Hopefully a physical camera shutter button as well.

Best thing to do with the buttons on the GS3 is to enable virtual buttons on the screen, then make the 'Home' button a 'camera shutter' button, and make the 'menu' and 'back' buttons 'answer call' and 'hang up call' with long press.
 

tuffjuff

Distinguished
Nov 29, 2011
118
0
18,680
[citation][nom]ajrm[/nom]Bated Breath...!!! looks a little bare at the bottom .. hopefully kills the iPhone once and for all..[/citation]

I wouldn't count on it.
 

raidenfox123

Distinguished
Sep 22, 2006
37
0
18,530
I would like to see it with a more rugged outer shell, I would rather have it be a little heavier and stronger then light and weak
 
[citation][nom]soo-nah-mee[/nom]It does, but I've always disliked the physical home button on my S3. I'd much rather have the home button be capacitive.[/citation]
Interesting. I have a capacitive home button and have wanted it to be physical. Android use a long-press of the home button to bring up your running apps list. I've found that because it's capacitive, sometimes if my finger moves a bit while I'm holding, it doesn't register as a long hold. A physical button would register it as a hold as long as I keep pressure applied. A little movement wouldn't matter.
 

soo-nah-mee

Distinguished
Feb 5, 2009
564
0
18,990
[citation][nom]Solandri[/nom]Interesting. I have a capacitive home button and have wanted it to be physical. Android use a long-press of the home button to bring up your running apps list. I've found that because it's capacitive, sometimes if my finger moves a bit while I'm holding, it doesn't register as a long hold. A physical button would register it as a hold as long as I keep pressure applied. A little movement wouldn't matter.[/citation]Maybe that's what I dislike more now that I think about it: Not so much the physical button but the fact that you have to hold it down to see the running apps list. I can't think of a better way to do it though without adding another button. Tablets have a button for it, but no menu button. That wouldn't work so well on a phone IMO.
 

keither5150

Distinguished
Sep 7, 2008
369
0
18,780
The first picture is a picture of a note 2 with the home button removed by photoshop.

If you are going to doctor a photo, a little effort would be appreciated.
 

Cy-Kill

Distinguished
Mar 9, 2010
232
0
18,690
I love how Tom's 99.9% of the time never links to the original article, and make it seem like it's originally there article!
 

mas

Distinguished
Jun 15, 2004
43
0
18,530
Still NEED the larger screen of the Note2 - or more preferably the phone features in the full blown larger tablets - where browsing and secure remote terminal access would be the preeminent application - if ONLY they would integrate ssh & RDP at the OS level (where they belong) for a tightly integrated STABLE/robust solution - thus negating the need to carry around a laptop - complete with its ever present security exposure.

Then FINALLY we would have a truly compelling converged device negating the need for a separate phone and laptop and an overpriced underpowered tablet.
 

spp85

Distinguished
Aug 11, 2011
699
0
19,360
why the screen size is getting bigger and bigger?? Its better to call this thing as a tablet than smartphone. The optimum size for a smartphone display size is 4 inches or a maximum of 4.2 inches greater than that the phone becomes bulky to handle and feels like holding a book to the ear while talking to someone........
 
Status
Not open for further replies.