For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners

[jad]

Archived from groups: alt.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

..os.-xp losers creepin in............

"Paul" <wf1000xg@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42c798e7$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> says he that has excellent grammer...............
>
> "
> > Wow fred, you incredible use..........
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:

> ... Yes, I'm a luddite.

Then why consider your opinion on this subject worthwhile reading?



>
>
>
>
>
>
> Path: newssvr17.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm02.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy2so!shaw.ca!pd7tw3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.71.93.197
> From: Fisher <fisher no_email.here>
> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
> Subject: Re: For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners
> Message-ID: <vp3gc1hjgb8ll1uittv6tr72rancu9krgi 4ax.com>
> References: <Xns96856CBADBD78wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <PhWwe.373822$cg1.89707@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <11cblnc9okvjf90@corp.supernews.com> <Xns9687371963E7wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <doedc1tubs2eqkqjofd3ogdu8038ug4uad@4ax.com> <33zxe.10639$302.8648@fe04.lga> <7r1ec1lm61vmsrhhcpn0qd6jd4kvvj9f5r@4ax.com> <Xns9687ADE9B605Bwisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <mtsfc1po67otm510d1mpkforasa2a8io3j@4ax.com> <Xns9688673708AE5wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 31
> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:13:12 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.67.253.205
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
> X-Trace: pd7tw3no 1120407192 24.67.253.205 (Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:13:12 MDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:13:12 MDT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:440171 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:739950
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Thusly John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid> Spake Unto All:

>Again. The Cordless Desktop Pro keyboard batteries last for at
>least one year. There must've been something wrong with your
>setup, or your perception.
>
>Others report equally long keyboard battery life.

Not all. I had Cordless Desktop Pro and had to replace my batteries
about once every three months.
I now use corded again, in the end it became irritating to run out of
power - there were never any batteries at home when I most needed
them.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Mean_Chlorine <mike_noren2002@NOSPAMyahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Thusly John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid> Spake Unto All:

>>Again. The Cordless Desktop Pro keyboard batteries last for at
>>least one year. There must've been something wrong with your
>>setup, or your perception.
>>Others report equally long keyboard battery life.
>
> Not all.

Have you ever heard of an assembly line?

> I had Cordless Desktop Pro and had to replace my batteries
> about once every three months.

In the mouse, yes. In the keyboard, no.

> I now use corded again, in the end it became irritating to run
> out of power - there were never any batteries at home when I
> most needed them.

Have you ever heard of rechargeable batteries?

It takes some sophistication.



>
>
>
>
>
> Path: newssvr17.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm02.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
> From: Mean_Chlorine <mike_noren2002 NOSPAMyahoo.co.uk>
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
> Subject: Re: For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners
> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:37:38 +0200
> Organization: The Men in Black
> Lines: 14
> Message-ID: <381gc1l0emasnqh681u4vi2n76u7r1gvbc 4ax.com>
> References: <Xns96856CBADBD78wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <PhWwe.373822$cg1.89707@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <11cblnc9okvjf90@corp.supernews.com> <Xns9687371963E7wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <doedc1tubs2eqkqjofd3ogdu8038ug4uad@4ax.com> <33zxe.10639$302.8648@fe04.lga> <7r1ec1lm61vmsrhhcpn0qd6jd4kvvj9f5r@4ax.com> <Xns9687ADE9B605Bwisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <mtsfc1po67otm510d1mpkforasa2a8io3j@4ax.com> <Xns9688673708AE5wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Trace: individual.net BpVmrV0QPmLVIfA3JEwXDQPUS2kJUbRXNAyZIAR+9D1o9FNK52
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:739937
>

 

[NoOne]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:37:38 +0200, Mean_Chlorine
<mike_noren2002@NOSPAMyahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>Thusly John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid> Spake Unto All:
>
>>Again. The Cordless Desktop Pro keyboard batteries last for at
>>least one year. There must've been something wrong with your
>>setup, or your perception.
>>
>>Others report equally long keyboard battery life.
>
>Not all. I had Cordless Desktop Pro and had to replace my batteries
>about once every three months.
>I now use corded again, in the end it became irritating to run out of
>power - there were never any batteries at home when I most needed
>them.
Try thinking ahead then.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Thusly Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> Spake Unto All:

>On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 09:00:25 -0700, "JAD" <kapasitor@earthcharter.net>
>wrote:
<trash>

I don't know if you guys are trolls or just overly excited about
nothing, but in the killfile you both go.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Thusly John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid> Spake Unto All:

>It takes some sophistication.

....and another one... Damn, there's a lot of them now, aren't there...

 

[fisher]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:25:15 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid>
wrote:

>Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:
>
>> ... Yes, I'm a luddite.
>
>Then why consider your opinion on this subject worthwhile reading?

Because I own an MX700 and I own speech recognition software - I
rejected both and for good reasons. Both have weaknesses. A corded
mouse is superior to a cordless mouse when it comes to preciseness and
speed, speech recognition software is not 100% fault free which makes
it 100% useless. My opinion is of merit.

 

[fisher]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:54:25 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:


>And there is no lag with the newer cordless devices.

All wireless devices have some lag. Whether you notice it or not is
another matter.

 

[fisher]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:59:51 +0200, Mean_Chlorine
<mike_noren2002@NOSPAMyahoo.co.uk> wrote:


>I don't know if you guys are trolls or just overly excited about
>nothing, but in the killfile you both go.

My heart pumps purple piss for you.

 

[fisher]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:50:39 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:


> I use my PC EVERYDAY for hours and I have not changed it's batteries
>in almost a year now.

Which keyboard? I bought the MX700 Duo and my keyboard doesn't last
anymore than a few months on the batteries. Maybe I got a duff
keyboard, I've already suggested that.

 

[fisher]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:07:31 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:


>Look up the word "marketing" you seem to have fallen for it hook line
>and sinker baby! Here is a hint for you: Yes they would call it a
>"gamers" mouse just for the hell of it.
>
>If Logitech comes out with a cordless laser mouse tomorrow and calls
>it the "Super Gamers Deluxe mouse " what will you do ? Probably the
>same thing you would do if someone stuck you in a round room and told
>you to piss in the corner.
>
>Personally I worry more about the lag from the net far more than the
>9999999 milliseconds if perceived lag from my mouse.

No. You look up the MX518 and read what it can do for a gamer then get
back to me.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

noone@home.net wrote:

> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:27:58 GMT, Fisher <fisher@no_email.here>
wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 22:07:14 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Here's an alternative to the reset button
>>>PUT SOME BATTERIES IN THE KEYBOARD
>>
>>Batteries cost money. I killed two birds with one stone, bought an
>>MX518, now I don't need batteries and I have a more responsive
mouse.
> Your key board cost money and your mouse isn't any more responsive
> than a MX1000.

True, but when he slings it across the room it comes back

 

[fisher]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:10:20 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:


>Your key board cost money and your mouse isn't any more responsive
>than a MX1000.
>

You're comparing an MX510 to an MX1000. Compare 518 not 510. MX1000
has skipping issues going by what I read at that forum posted in this
thread. With 518 I can run it at various DPI settings on the fly up to
1600 DPI, 510 only does 800 DPI. Different games are sometimes better
at lower or higher DPI settings, when sniping you may want to lower
the DPI for more finer control. That's why it's called a "gamer's"
mouse. I can get the 510 for $29.99 CAD right now, the 518 goes for
$59.99 CAD. There's a reason it costs more.

 

[fisher]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:09:37 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid>
wrote:


>
>It would not work for my 83 year-old next-door neighbor who likes
>to lean back and place the mouse on her lap while playing FreeCell
>or Mah-jongg.

Well, your 83 year old neighbour wouldn't notice the 10 milliseconds
of lag in the mouse anyway so cordless is the way to go.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:09:37 GMT, John Doe
> <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid>

>>It would not work for my 83 year-old next-door neighbor who
>>likes to lean back and place the mouse on her lap while playing
>>FreeCell or Mah-jongg.
>
> Well, your 83 year old neighbour wouldn't notice the 10
> milliseconds of lag in the mouse anyway so cordless is the way
> to go.

What 10 ms lag are you talking about?



>
>
>
>
> Path: newssvr19.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm06.news.prodigy.com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy2so!shaw.ca!pd7tw3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.71.93.197
> From: Fisher <fisher no_email.here>
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
> Subject: Re: For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners
> Message-ID: <h1mgc1p2lih90eck78o3jgrltbptlq26fl 4ax.com>
> References: <Xns96856CBADBD78wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <PhWwe.373822$cg1.89707@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <11cblnc9okvjf90@corp.supernews.com> <Xns9687371963E7wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <doedc1tubs2eqkqjofd3ogdu8038ug4uad@4ax.com> <33zxe.10639$302.8648@fe04.lga> <b2bec1ts9g6089php5s2e7f4pjgqog3nn6@4ax.com> <prtfc11gibka2js58u22tsc2roja3f3ttl@4ax.com> <Xns96887BB606528wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 11
> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:23:14 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.67.253.205
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
> X-Trace: pd7tw3no 1120425794 24.67.253.205 (Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:23:14 MDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:23:14 MDT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:740014
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:08:44 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid>

>>Do you use your PC more than about 12 hours per day, ...

> Yes.

And where do spend the other two hours?

troll

> Path: newssvr17.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm02.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy2so!shaw.ca!pd7tw3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.71.93.197
> From: Fisher <fisher no_email.here>
> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
> Subject: Re: For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners
> Message-ID: <vp3gc1hjgb8ll1uittv6tr72rancu9krgi 4ax.com>
> References: <Xns96856CBADBD78wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <PhWwe.373822$cg1.89707@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <11cblnc9okvjf90@corp.supernews.com> <Xns9687371963E7wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <doedc1tubs2eqkqjofd3ogdu8038ug4uad@4ax.com> <33zxe.10639$302.8648@fe04.lga> <7r1ec1lm61vmsrhhcpn0qd6jd4kvvj9f5r@4ax.com> <Xns9687ADE9B605Bwisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <mtsfc1po67otm510d1mpkforasa2a8io3j@4ax.com> <Xns9688673708AE5wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 31
> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:13:12 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.67.253.205
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
> X-Trace: pd7tw3no 1120407192 24.67.253.205 (Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:13:12 MDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:13:12 MDT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:440171 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:739950
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Troll

Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:

> Path: newssvr19.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm06.news.prodigy.com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy2so!pd7cy1no!shaw.ca!pd7tw1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.71.93.197
> From: Fisher <fisher no_email.here>
> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
> Subject: Re: For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners
> Message-ID: <c2kgc19kgg3of4ipkk6t65047k7b65fu68 4ax.com>
> References: <11cblnc9okvjf90@corp.supernews.com> <Xns9687371963E7wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <doedc1tubs2eqkqjofd3ogdu8038ug4uad@4ax.com> <33zxe.10639$302.8648@fe04.lga> <7r1ec1lm61vmsrhhcpn0qd6jd4kvvj9f5r@4ax.com> <Xns9687ADE9B605Bwisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <mtsfc1po67otm510d1mpkforasa2a8io3j@4ax.com> <Xns9688673708AE5wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <vp3gc1hjgb8ll1uittv6tr72rancu9krgi@4ax.com> <ig9gc15s4pln1b7ohq3a3or4oud1b4ko8j@4ax.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 7
> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 20:48:42 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.67.253.205
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
> X-Trace: pd7tw1no 1120423722 24.67.253.205 (Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:48:42 MDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:48:42 MDT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:440195 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:740001
>
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:54:25 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:
>
>
>>And there is no lag with the newer cordless devices.
>
> All wireless devices have some lag. Whether you notice it or not is
> another matter.
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Fisher <http://groups-beta.google.com/advanced_search?num=100
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:10:20 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:

>>Your key board cost money and your mouse isn't any more
>>responsive than a MX1000.

> You're comparing an MX510 to an MX1000. Compare 518 not 510.
> MX1000 has skipping issues going by what I read at that forum
> posted in this thread.

So your dozens of troll posts in this thread "For Logitech MX1000
laser mouse owners" are based on zero experience.

I guess you are just begging to be sold on the mouse.




>
>
>
>
> Path: newssvr19.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm06.news.prodigy.com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy2so!pd7cy1no!shaw.ca!pd7tw2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.71.93.197
> From: Fisher <fisher no_email.here>
> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
> Subject: Re: For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners
> Message-ID: <6clgc1h2pahlnkgbqudufmuosu3d761fas 4ax.com>
> References: <Xns96856CBADBD78wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <PhWwe.373822$cg1.89707@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <11cblnc9okvjf90@corp.supernews.com> <Xns9687371963E7wisdomfolly@207.115.63.158> <doedc1tubs2eqkqjofd3ogdu8038ug4uad@4ax.com> <33zxe.10639$302.8648@fe04.lga> <7r1ec1lm61vmsrhhcpn0qd6jd4kvvj9f5r@4ax.com> <70iec1h2q9rlh0jgjc3ebcadvu34frftat@4ax.com> <0otfc1915mdj3mr5tqb4v6fblt20ie2126@4ax.com> <0eagc1lkrfhp5ecpdb5is06nroejdjat0o@4ax.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 15
> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:20:05 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.67.253.205
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
> X-Trace: pd7tw2no 1120425605 24.67.253.205 (Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:20:05 MDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:20:05 MDT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:440202 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:740012

See also: James Calivar

 

[NoOne]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 20:48:42 GMT, Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:54:25 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:
>
>
>>And there is no lag with the newer cordless devices.
>
>All wireless devices have some lag. Whether you notice it or not is
>another matter.
If you can't notice it what's the problem? And BTW this thread is
about the mx1000 not all wireless devices.
Maybe you could help me out here and give me some FACTS on this lag
that all wireless devices have ? Then tell me the lag of the mx1000.

 

[NoOne]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 20:53:32 GMT, Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:07:31 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:
>
>
>>Look up the word "marketing" you seem to have fallen for it hook line
>>and sinker baby! Here is a hint for you: Yes they would call it a
>>"gamers" mouse just for the hell of it.
>>
>>If Logitech comes out with a cordless laser mouse tomorrow and calls
>>it the "Super Gamers Deluxe mouse " what will you do ? Probably the
>>same thing you would do if someone stuck you in a round room and told
>>you to piss in the corner.
>>
>>Personally I worry more about the lag from the net far more than the
>>9999999 milliseconds if perceived lag from my mouse.
>
>No. You look up the MX518 and read what it can do for a gamer then get
>back to me.

I have and all it does is change DPI on the fly...BIG WOOOOOP!
But what does that have to do with marketing ? (That's a trick
question BTW)

 

[NoOne]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:16:24 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid>
wrote:

>noone@home.net wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:27:58 GMT, Fisher <fisher@no_email.here>
>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 22:07:14 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Here's an alternative to the reset button
>>>>PUT SOME BATTERIES IN THE KEYBOARD
>>>
>>>Batteries cost money. I killed two birds with one stone, bought an
>>>MX518, now I don't need batteries and I have a more responsive
>mouse.
>> Your key board cost money and your mouse isn't any more responsive
>> than a MX1000.
>
>True, but when he slings it across the room it comes back
It must have hit him one to many times in the head. Good thing it
wasn't one of those damn heavy ass cordless ones or he might be dead.

 

[NoOne]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:20:05 GMT, Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:10:20 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:
>
>
>>Your key board cost money and your mouse isn't any more responsive
>>than a MX1000.
>>
>
>You're comparing an MX510 to an MX1000. Compare 518 not 510.

Actually I didn't compare them Tom did. Maybe I'm mistaken here but
the tread is about the MX 1000 not the MX 510.

I think if you think a little you would see that the MX 1000 was
compared to the 510 because it was the current "gamers" mouse at the
time. You said that "gamer" mice had to better for a reason because
they called it a "Gamers mouse" and they would do that for no good
reason. Has you can see from the article that isn't always true.

I say just wait and we'll see a laser with the same ability in the
future and it to will be better than the 518. The fact is that your
opinions are just that.

>MX1000
>has skipping issues going by what I read at that forum posted in this
>thread. With 518 I can run it at various DPI settings on the fly up to
>1600 DPI, 510 only does 800 DPI. Different games are sometimes better
>at lower or higher DPI settings, when sniping you may want to lower
>the DPI for more finer control. That's why it's called a "gamer's"
>mouse. I can get the 510 for $29.99 CAD right now, the 518 goes for
>$59.99 CAD. There's a reason it costs more.
LOL
Yes it cost more because its the latest model, period.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

John Doe, <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid>, the malodorous, trenchant greaseball,
and coffin maker, jabbered:

> Troll

Thanks, I will!

Now that we have established that you're a kiddie-fiddler and we have access
to your records, what do you propose to do?

--
For my own part, I have never had a thought which I could not set down
in words with even more distinctness than that with which I conceived
it. There is, however, a class of fancies of exquisite delicacy which
are not thoughts, and to which as yet I have found it absolutely
impossible to adapt to language. These fancies arise in the soul, alas
how rarely. Only at epochs of most intense tranquillity, when the
bodily and mental health are in perfection. And at those weird points
of time, where the confines of the waking world blend with the world of
dreams. And so I captured this fancy, where all that we see, or seem,
is but a dream within a dream.

 

[fisher]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 23:46:44 -0400, noone@home.net wrote:


>
>I have and all it does is change DPI on the fly...BIG WOOOOOP!
>But what does that have to do with marketing ? (That's a trick
>question BTW)

The question is "what does that do for a gamer?", marketing has
nothing to do with it.