I also found it interesting the disclosure of how heavy this thing is, as well as the need for specialized personnel and equipment required to move it. Optical and cabing not included....and how about the aspect that 1% of this gigantic pool of RAM is bad. They mention ECC RAM and one could do the math as to how many sticks that compromises and wonder if it can even be found at this point?
It seems to me a lot like the current owner has found a way to have someone else pay to move a large bit of equipment that is facing operational obsolescence.
$50,000 bid right now and still "reserve not met." It's pretty clear the US gov't doesn't really want to try to fix the problems with Cheyenne, but it also looks like it's not just trying to offload the movement of the hardware to someone else. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a reserve.
Though I suspect when all is said and done, they might attempt to work out some agreement with the top bidder, whether or not the reserve has been met. 1.7MW of power is a lot, to say the least. Sure, there are supercomputers that can use 60MW out there... but those are also not leaking and failing in various ways, and they're about 150X faster than this older supercomputer.
The real difficulty is that, even if you want to part this sucker out, that will take a long time and it's very niche hardware considering its age. You can often find used servers from 10 years back selling for a song, relatively speaking. Because data centers don't want them, and neither do most businesses or even server enthusiasts. Anyone who has been in a data center can tell you how much fun it is to sit next to even one server with all those whirring fans!
I'm betting the top bidder will end up being some recycling / parting out business, though. I just can't imagine anyone really wanting to try to "fix" a leaky supercomputer that the US government is unwilling to deal with.