Disappointing showing for Meteor lake here on this platform, bested in Single thread by prior gen and killed by the XPS QUALCOMM comparison.
This is Frameworks 4th Intel iteration and its a poor showing of battery life regression here, even with a bigger screen (You can achieve higher refresh rate and lower power consumption thanks to VRR which this has). Would love to see another battery comparison on 13th vs 14th gen with the screen being identical.
Battery regression is not new for Framework, which showed regressions also
from 11th to 12th gen .
Only 12th to 13th gen showed battery life improvements (6.7%). Encouraging that the big issues are being ironed out though (
Continuous power consumption HDMI card). Also somehow Intel is beating ryzen on battery on framework:
Forbes review
With the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U inside, the Framework 13 ran for 6 hours and 21 minutes. But Intel’s Core Ultra 7 155H outlasted it, staying alive for 6 hours and 33 minutes of video playback.
Congrats, Intel: you finally landed a win!
With Qualcomm and M1-M4 on the scene destroying x86 on battery life, I truly hope Framework will embrace Lunar lake even though it is antithesis of reparability (Ram on package with CPU). Otherwise I hope Arrowlake is competitive with power.
I am seriously considering a framework purchase but if they are not more performant, or more efficient on the same chip (See comparison to zenbook with OLED which is not a power efficient display) as well as being the more expensive option as configured ($800 more than the Asus $1300 vs $2100) makes justify such a purchase impossible. Want to support the framework eco system but that is a bit too rich and big of a chasm for my ideals.