FS: Magicolor 330 laserprinter consumables

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

These are now surplus to requirement. No reasonable offer refused for
individual items or preferably the whole job lot.

QMS-Minolta 'Magicolor 330' A3 colour laser printer consumables:

1 x fuser oil roller (QMS1710527-001)
Retail c. £45.00

2 x Waste toner cartridge (QMS1710324-001)
Retail c. £35.00 ea. = c. £70.00

9 x toner cartridges (2 x c,y,k + 3 x m)
Retail c. £85.00 ea. = c. £765.00

Total retail value = c. £880.00 - no reasonable offer refused.

e-mail: Peter <peter.chap@gmail.com>

Nottingham/Derby area
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

> Spam refers to email and this is a news group.

"Spamming is defined as posting identical or nearly-identical messages
(not just ads, although ads are usually what spammers post) to a lot of
newsgroups, one right after the other. Since it's really not that
difficult to write a program that will post the same advertisement to
dozens, if not hundreds or thousands of newsgroups, a lot of people
have taken to doing this."
--ftp://ftp.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/advertising/how-to/part1

While officaly one may call a single ad "off topic" and many ads "spam"
I would argue that the term "spam" does apply to the newsgroups in the
exact same way that bulk e-mail is refered to as spam. But given that
people get confused and call a single e-mail "spam" even if it wasn't a
bulk mail, I can see where someone without a background in the meaning
of these woulds would misuse it in either case.
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

zakezuke wrote:
>>Spam refers to email and this is a news group.
>
>
> "Spamming is defined as posting identical or nearly-identical messages
> (not just ads, although ads are usually what spammers post) to a lot of
> newsgroups, one right after the other. Since it's really not that
> difficult to write a program that will post the same advertisement to
> dozens, if not hundreds or thousands of newsgroups, a lot of people
> have taken to doing this."
> --ftp://ftp.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/advertising/how-to/part1
>
> While officaly one may call a single ad "off topic" and many ads "spam"
> I would argue that the term "spam" does apply to the newsgroups in the
> exact same way that bulk e-mail is refered to as spam. But given that
> people get confused and call a single e-mail "spam" even if it wasn't a
> bulk mail, I can see where someone without a background in the meaning
> of these woulds would misuse it in either case.
>

Thanks for the clarifaction. I was incorrect to say that spam only
related to email.
However, according to your posted definition, the post in question does
not fit the description of "spam", correct?
Frank
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

A Brit SPAMMER

peter.chap@gmail.com wrote:

>These are now surplus to requirement. No reasonable offer refused for
>individual items or preferably the whole job lot.
>
>QMS-Minolta 'Magicolor 330' A3 colour laser printer consumables:
>
>1 x fuser oil roller (QMS1710527-001)
>Retail c. £45.00
>
>2 x Waste toner cartridge (QMS1710324-001)
>Retail c. £35.00 ea. = c. £70.00
>
>9 x toner cartridges (2 x c,y,k + 3 x m)
>Retail c. £85.00 ea. = c. £765.00
>
>Total retail value = c. £880.00 - no reasonable offer refused.
>
>e-mail: Peter <peter.chap@gmail.com>
>
>Nottingham/Derby area
>
>
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

measekite wrote:
> A Brit SPAMMER
>
> peter.chap@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> These are now surplus to requirement. No reasonable offer refused for
>> individual items or preferably the whole job lot.
>>
>> QMS-Minolta 'Magicolor 330' A3 colour laser printer consumables:
>>
>> 1 x fuser oil roller (QMS1710527-001)
>> Retail c. £45.00
>>
>> 2 x Waste toner cartridge (QMS1710324-001)
>> Retail c. £35.00 ea. = c. £70.00
>>
>> 9 x toner cartridges (2 x c,y,k + 3 x m)
>> Retail c. £85.00 ea. = c. £765.00
>>
>> Total retail value = c. £880.00 - no reasonable offer refused.
>>
>> e-mail: Peter <peter.chap@gmail.com>
>>
>> Nottingham/Derby area
>>
>>
>>
As usual, you're confused. Spam refers to email and this is a news group.
Big difference.
Take your meds.
Frank
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

> However, according to your posted definition, the post in question does
> not fit the description of "spam", correct?

I refuse to pass judgement on this issue. To be fair i'd have to do
some research into this person's posting, and i'm too lazy. And i'm
not so much of a nick-pick that I would employ my time over an issue
that I consider to be hair splitting. Call it spam if you like, call
it off topic if you like. It's no more or less accurate than
describing an unwanted e-mail as spam even though it's impossible for
the end user to judge how many people actually got the same or similar
copy.

If you want my judgement - you both were wrong - not only semantically
but in the fact that this tree, my self included is 100% off topic. At
least the parent's topic was at least related to printers, though
should be reserved for the misc.forsale.printers group. In this case,
it's my judgement that we are all foofoo heads and should sit in the
corner and be ashamed. Case dismissed
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

zakezuke wrote:

>>However, according to your posted definition, the post in question does
>>not fit the description of "spam", correct?
>
>
> I refuse to pass judgement on this issue. To be fair i'd have to do
> some research into this person's posting, and i'm too lazy. And i'm
> not so much of a nick-pick that I would employ my time over an issue
> that I consider to be hair splitting. Call it spam if you like, call
> it off topic if you like. It's no more or less accurate than
> describing an unwanted e-mail as spam even though it's impossible for
> the end user to judge how many people actually got the same or similar
> copy.
>
> If you want my judgement - you both were wrong - not only semantically
> but in the fact that this tree, my self included is 100% off topic. At
> least the parent's topic was at least related to printers, though
> should be reserved for the misc.forsale.printers group. In this case,
> it's my judgement that we are all foofoo heads and should sit in the
> corner and be ashamed. Case dismissed
>

Without getting into a diatribe, the poster appears to have only posted
to this ng.
Frank
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom