Its all the same...If you have lower speeds you can tighten the timings.
Or raise the clock 1:4 (4 multiplier) and run it at stock settings. im not sure whats better for DDR3. For DDR2 its all the same but DDR3 might be different
Then as long as its not overclocking the ram then you are fine....lower speed just means titghter timings...all the same
No.
Higher speeds (MHz) mean more bandwidth, which means faster read/writes and the like. It might not be tangible in most situations but it is there.
CAS 7 DDR3-1600 = 0.0043
CAS 5 DDR2-1066 = 0.0046
CAS 4 DDR2-800 = 0.005
Lower is better, and I just did time / MHz because I don't feel like dealing with nanoseconds by using MegaHz instead of just Hz. The idea is the same, just add zeroes.
Running in 1:1 is the most "efficient" as the story goes. In all reality the higher you can run the bandwidth the better the performance will be (synthetic). You just may not see a difference in real world benchmarks.
O sorry the 4 nanoseconds difference...I was referring to real world stuff
But then you always had more knowledge on this stuff
Well eventually there is a real world difference.
We don't run DDR400 in our machines anymore (well new ones that is).
The real world differences between DDR2-800 and DDR2-1066 might be negligible, but once you start talking DDR3-1600 and the rest, it might make a bit of difference (especially in memory intensive applications.. like Super Pi).