Just ran into this old thread.. for a good laugh:
I think that deserves an Oscar for cluelessness. How come no one corrected this BS ? He didnt post it only once, but in at least 5 different threads. I guess I wasnt around...
= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
<A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=279073#279073" target="_new">AMD selected to use dual 32bit cores instead of a true 64bit core, with that they could have exploited the SMP capabilites of dual cores coupled with internal northbridge. this would have been a logical path to take. This truely would have been SMP on a chip. So we do know the Hammer will not be SMP for 32bit apps.
<b>AMD elected to use software massaged code morphing to add zero's to 32 bit code leaving 1 core useless as its passes zero's</b>. and software morphing is gonna take a 64bit string break it into 2 32bit strings and feed each core. how much overhead is this morphing gonna use?</A>
I think that deserves an Oscar for cluelessness. How come no one corrected this BS ? He didnt post it only once, but in at least 5 different threads. I guess I wasnt around...
= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =