Y yeung107 Distinguished Jan 19, 2013 56 0 18,530 Feb 4, 2013 #1 Wondering how much better the 8120 apart from the 4100. Asking as just a question, not buying.
anxiousinfusion Distinguished Jul 1, 2011 1,035 0 19,360 Feb 4, 2013 #2 For all practical purposes, either are only mediocre for gaming. Rendering and video editing will see a boost from the 8120 over the 4100. FX-X3XX series is out, btw. Upvote 0 Downvote
For all practical purposes, either are only mediocre for gaming. Rendering and video editing will see a boost from the 8120 over the 4100. FX-X3XX series is out, btw.
stantheman123 Distinguished Aug 21, 2011 663 0 19,010 Feb 4, 2013 #3 The fx 6300/4300/8350/8320 (pile driver) are all better choices at the same price point Upvote 0 Downvote
Y yeung107 Distinguished Jan 19, 2013 56 0 18,530 Feb 4, 2013 #4 Is the 8120 slightly faster? Upvote 0 Downvote
ohyouknow Distinguished Nov 18, 2011 956 0 19,160 Feb 4, 2013 #6 In multithreaded applications it is much faster. In gaming, the clock speeds determine the difference in Bulldozer arch. Upvote 0 Downvote
In multithreaded applications it is much faster. In gaming, the clock speeds determine the difference in Bulldozer arch.
rds1220 Splendid Sep 10, 2011 3,717 8 23,815 Feb 4, 2013 #7 Both are Bulldozer and both are pretty crappy. If you really want to go AMD atleast go with Piledriver. Upvote 0 Downvote
Both are Bulldozer and both are pretty crappy. If you really want to go AMD atleast go with Piledriver.