Fx 6100 and GTX 660 ,1600x900

[rohanrobby7]

Fx 6100 and GTX 660 ,1600x900 Resolution , will they give maximum output as per their potential ?

 

[DarkSable]

I'd go with a 6300, but yeah, those are good picks for that resolution.

 

[rohanrobby7]

I'd go with a 6300, but yeah, those are good picks for that resolution.

are you sure 6100 wont cause a bottleneck ?

 

[Robert Ostrowski]

that's a good combo for that resolution. they are about the same tier performance wise, so you shouldn't have any bottlenecks, especially at 1600x900

 

[rohanrobby7]

that's a good combo for that resolution. they are about the same tier performance wise, so you shouldn't have any bottlenecks, especially at 1600x900

what if i go for crysis 3? i played that game, gave me 28 min , 45 max fps. i think that is not what we expect from a 960 core GDDR5 192bit GPU.
Please tell me are the fps okey ? i think they are less for 1600x900 :\

 

[ihog]

No, that sounds about right for a 660. You get the performance you pay for, brotha.

 

[rohanrobby7]

No, that sounds about right for a 660. You get the performance you pay for, brotha.

may be you are right, one more thing i wpuld like to share, i had a gtx 550 Ti before, it gave me 18~32 fps on 1600x900 ultra settings on crysis 3. aftr buying 660 , there isnt a big change ! thats what i am saying !
I want you to reassure that 6100 does good. i am a noob in CPU knowledge, still learning.

 

[iam2thecrowe]

the 6100 is poor, a 4350 would be better overall despite having less cores, its faster IPC and clock speed override that. the 6300 is an even better choice obviously.