DSzymborski :
madmatt30 :
Run a gtx 970 with a 6300 (admittedly overclocked) for 3 years.
At this current point in time the 970 has become more of a limitation than the 6300 in a lot of games.
Its not going to struggle running a 1050, that 1050 will limit gaming performance a lot more than the fx 6300
No, I agree, they're well-matched. I'm only talking in the context of an upgrade path or preferable options with the money.
Oh I agree absolutely aswell.
The issue here is taking a setup based entirely on already owning ddr3 ram is just going to be non-beneficial in every way possible anyway.
You are stuck with a dead socket & fairly non-upgradeable system anyway.
Haswell would have been a better choice no doubt because at least there is still some semblance of availability but prices generally are cripplingly high for old spec hardware.
Ivy/sandy I wouldn't even consider because unless you get a k series chip & a z series board (which is nigh impossible for reasonable money now) you would be stuck with a stock speed chip ,likely sata 2 with no usb & poor ram speed support.
Am3+ ? you can at least get half decent board still reasonably priced with fairly upto date specs.
& in all honesty ,& in my own practical experience ,a 6300@4ghz performs virtually the same as a 3570 in gaming scenarios no matter what the gpu .
There is a lot of 'rose tinted' reminiscing of the ivy/sandy cpu's but the fact is without a substantial overclock they are showing their age every bit as much as the piledriver chips.
Sold my last 2 ivybridge setups a few months back ( apart from my dell laptop which is still going strong),I kept the 6300 because imo its actually the better general use cpu.
Itll go soon though as I have 2 ryzen rigs but the fact is its the one cpu I actually feel kind of attached to,I will honestly be sorry to get rid as I personally think from 2012 to 2016 it was actually amd's best cpu by a long long long way.