FX 8100 vs FX 6100 vs FX 6300

[Arishok N7]

Which is the better CPU? Primarily for gaming, but will also obviously use it for normal pc stuff.

 

[de5_Roy]

fx8320 is better than all of those.

fx8100 and 6100 are older bulldozer cpus and 6300 is new but it has one less module (two less cores).
fx6300 would be a budget choice(over fx6100) if cpu fund is limited.

 

[bhushannagpure059]

Fx 6300 !
because most of the new gen games use only 6 cores as they are sufficient. For normal computation it depends on your uses. If you are heavy multitask-er then go for 8100.

Instead of 6300 and 8100 i will recommend to go for 6350 and 8300or8350.

 

[SimonGranstrom]

If you can afford, get a 8320.
Just make sure you stay away from the X100 series because they are crap.

 

[Darkresurrection]

6300, if you can afford 8320 and your mobo supports it then 8320.
fx 6100 and 8100 and and anything from AMD with the code name -100 or -150 anything that has that one as its second digit uses Bulldozer architecture, I love AMD but we should accpet those CPUs were a flop, those CPUs which have -300 -320 -350 enjoy Pile driver architecture, which is far better than Bulldozer architecture. So no wonder fx 6300 beats 8100 easily, also look here http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-FX-8100-vs-AMD-FX-6300
Don't forget to close the post, if you feel you have no other questions