fx-8350 temperature range

[ambiguousmoth1337]

As the title says, what is the normal temperature range for a fx-8350 air cooled idle and load? Any help will be greatly appreciated.

 

[cemerian]

normal is whats acceptable for you but max temp for cores before they start to throttle is 62c so unless your temps are around there i wouldn't worry

 

[ambiguousmoth1337]

K, I felt my temperatures stayed at a decent range 33ish/39 idle and while gaming the max I have seen it go up to is 47. The main reason I was curious is how much of a difference the temperature range is on my new board which is a sabertooth 990fx r2.0 compared to my old board a msi 990fxa-gd2.

 

[mjaweesome85]

normal is whats acceptable for you but max temp for cores before they start to throttle is 62c so unless your temps are around there i wouldn't worry

If the CPU starts to throttle at a 62c then its a piece of crap, thats no temp at all, stress testing my i5 2500k runs at 60c and that is good iv seen them upwards of 90 and still going strong

 

[cemerian]

normal is whats acceptable for you but max temp for cores before they start to throttle is 62c so unless your temps are around there i wouldn't worry

If the CPU starts to throttle at a 62c then its a piece of crap, thats no temp at all, stress testing my i5 2500k runs at 60c and that is good iv seen them upwards of 90 and still going strong

its not a piece of crap amd cpu's are made differently, i could say intel is peace of crap because they let their cpu's to get up to 90c instead of amd's 62c, my fx 8350 @5,4 ghz was never above 56c under full load(p95, ibt) with custom loop, while the same loop cools intel to 81c under stress testing, with that statement you showed you know absolutely nothing about cpu's

 

[SMOKINACE]

normal is whats acceptable for you but max temp for cores before they start to throttle is 62c so unless your temps are around there i wouldn't worry

If the CPU starts to throttle at a 62c then its a piece of crap, thats no temp at all, stress testing my i5 2500k runs at 60c and that is good iv seen them upwards of 90 and still going strong

its not a piece of crap amd cpu's are made differently, i could say intel is peace of crap because they let their cpu's to get up to 90c instead of amd's 62c, my fx 8350 @5,4 ghz was never above 56c under full load(p95, ibt) with custom loop, while the same loop cools intel to 81c under stress testing, with that statement you showed you know absolutely nothing about cpu's

I thought AMD processors ran hotter than intel... With my 8350 im getting 53 deg at load... Thats ok, right?????

 

[cemerian]

yup thats ok

 

[SproutyPC]

Cemerian I will have to paste you this post from another user below -

Ok, so for a 3rd time. Amount of heat and the Degrees are two entirely different properties. For processors - the most important factors for being "hotter" is the Amount of heat produced which depends on power consumed and the thermal density.

Just that you see more degrees on a CPU does not mean that the CPU is hotter than another. Heat is not just a number in degrees. A frying pan reaches 200 C on its surface. A radiator goes to 60. Are you telling me that the frying pan is going to heat your house better. Learn some basics physics.

Intel sucks half the power FX does. Intel has higher thermal density. But Intel produces less heat as in "volume". And that is the answer to the question.

 

[cemerian]

Cemerian I will have to paste you this post from another user below -

Ok, so for a 3rd time. Amount of heat and the Degrees are two entirely different properties. For processors - the most important factors for being "hotter" is the Amount of heat produced which depends on power consumed and the thermal density.

Just that you see more degrees on a CPU does not mean that the CPU is hotter than another. Heat is not just a number in degrees. A frying pan reaches 200 C on its surface. A radiator goes to 60. Are you telling me that the frying pan is going to heat your house better. Learn some basics physics.

Intel sucks half the power FX does. Intel has higher thermal density. But Intel produces less heat as in "volume". And that is the answer to the question.

nothing i din't know, why are you showing me this?