Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (
More info?)
I am a firm believer in protection of intellectual property. It is true,
however, that many large companies know that they can sue smaller firms and
either break them or intimidate them financially with legal costs. It is
also true that China has been lax in enforcing intellectual property rights.
Hopefully, third party manufacturers have altered the cartridge designs
enough to avoid infringement.
"Ototin" <bangsit@balay.ca> wrote in message
news:v8r571dsolj4ffgbs9mugre2qljuoru047@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 01:05:20 GMT, "KnumbKnuts"
> <[nospam]jhansman@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>>Of course not. Were I an inventor (I'm not), I'd be plenty pissed if
>>someone
>>ripped off an idea I had, especially if I patented it. You and I both know
>>that's *not* why this lawsuit has been filed.
>
> I don't know. From the news report it seems to me that Epson's patents
> on the ink cartridges has been infringe upon.
>
>>Anytime a big tech company
>>sees its market hegemony threatened, it trots out its legal staff to find
>>a
>>way to stop the 'transgressor' in court, usually because it can't stop
>>them
>>in the market place. If ya can't beat 'em (pricewise), sue 'em.
>
> If the 'transgressor' has respected Epson's patents then they would
> not have trotted out their legal staff.
>
>>"Ototin" <bangsit@balay.ca> wrote in message
>>news:ng74715vtsrcmrofsgf17a0shnnlnloiul@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 01:54:18 GMT, "KnumbKnuts"
>>> <[nospam]jhansman@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>> >"measekite" <measekite@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> >news:6Zfce.3205$Gd7.1200@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>>>
>>>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1093&e=3&u=/pcworld/2005042
>>8/tc_pcworld/120610
>>> >
>>> >Ah yes, the old patent infringement strategy. What bullshit.
>>>
>>> What makes you so sure that it is not true? Do you believe that patent
>>> infringement is to be tolerated?
>