I just learned how to calculate the true latency of ram.
Ok well its just A*B=C, but it wasn't immediately obvious lol.
Let me know if the math is wrong or if this is just completely wrong ...
http://www.crucial.com/usa/en/memory-performance-speed-latency
5000/2 = 2500
1/2500(ddr4) = a cycle time of 0.4 nanoseconds.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAS_latency
Which closely matches the CAS for DDR4-4800 of 0.417 nanoseconds
0.4 nanoseconds x a cas of 21 = a true latency of 8.4 nanoseconds.
To put this in perspective lets focus on the original timings of the ram to see if this is faster or slower.
The original G.Skill Trident was a DDR4-4700 with a CAS of 19
4700/2 = 2350
1/2350 = a cycle time of 0.425 nanoseconds
0.425 nanoseconds x a cas of 19 = a true latency of 8.075
Meaning the original ram was quicker by about 4% due do its tighter timings.
It is still an accomplishment, as mentioned earlier, but I guess this is why they haven't pushed the 5000 into marketing.
If they drop the cas down to 20 with the 5000 overclock that would come out to
0.4 nanoseconds x a cas of 20 = a true latency of 8.00 nanoseconds, about 1% faster than the marketed overclock and timings.