Question G.Skill Tridentz Neo 3800mhz CL14 different (and possibly weak) ns latency results in DRAM Calculator Membench & Aida64

May 30, 2020
17
2
15
1
Hello,

Should I be worried that something is wrong with the latency results of these memory kits?

DRAM Calculator Membench shows 64-65ns results every time, rarely shows something like 69ns

Whereas Aida 64 shows always stable 67.3 ns

My ram has parameters 3800mhz cl14 14-13-13-20-50 1.5V

Are these results not too weak for such parameters?
Is it also because I am at the Ryzen IF limit and this causes some instability?
My ram is paired with 3900X on Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi, it is working with IF 1:1


Here are my timings from Zen Timings

Is there room to tighten subtimings?
View: https://i.imgur.com/cnuvKg8.png
 
Last edited:
May 30, 2020
17
2
15
1
NO nothing is wrong if your stable and have achieved 3800Mhz with Primary Timings as is. Very little to gain performance wise changing Secondary Timings.

Thanks

Anyway i tightened subtimings with DRAM Calculator (FAST Option) and now in AIDA64 latency is 63.5 ns, much better
 
Sep 26, 2020
6
1
15
0
Hey there I have same memory kit as yourself and similar mother board (Crosshair VIII Formula) you could tighten that up a bit i think...
willl take sreen shot of my settings and post
 
Sep 26, 2020
6
1
15
0
i dont know how to easily do this lol??? i have the pic saved locally but this forum seems to like to not to like that wayy hahaha
 
May 30, 2020
17
2
15
1
He He!! Great minds think alike.
Anyway, i was forced to decrease memory freq to 3733 due to instability of system booting - sometimes system bootedm good with enabled xmp, sometimes system posted few times and xmp wasnt enabled. I tried everything to get more stable, but i think that i hit the wall. Anyway 3733 is good too. And im even able to do 3733 CL13, but i didnt test stability of that in memtest
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS