gaming pc ram

meteora881

Reputable
Jul 31, 2014
64
0
4,630
he is my build if that will help in determing which ram to get http://pcpartpicker.com/p/4J3KK8
which ram should i choose?

2400

cas 11 1.65 v
cas 10 1.65 v

2133

cas 11 1.5v
cas 9 1.65v
cas 10 1.6v
cas 11 1.6v

2000

cas 9 1.5v

1866

cas 9 1.5v
cas10 1.5v
cas 8 1.5v



or should i choose from something from the 1600?
 
Solution
The motherboard you picked would suite your needs just fine. From personal experience the 780 does a very nice job of games. I have no regrets. Just FYI the 290x does run very hot but on the other hand you would have Mantle support. Mantle won't do too much for you as you have a very good CPU.
For gaming, 8 GB of 1600 Mhz RAM. You'll only need 8GB for gaming..
See this benchmarks http://www.anandtech.com/show/6372/memory-performance-16gb-ddr31333-to-ddr32400-on-ivy-bridge-igp-with-gskill/8, there's merely a very small difference between the speeds..
 
so i pick lowest cas but then what about timing...which is better 9-9-9-24 or 9-10-9-28?

 

The OFFICIAL spec only goes to 1600. The memory OVERCLOCK speed can go to 3000.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7364/memory-scaling-on-haswell

Overclocking is usually what people buy K-chips for.

 


Before I say your right. Show me something with an i5
 

Here is the "overclock database"
http://www.overclock.net/t/1411077/haswell-overclocking-guide-with-statistics

Plenty of i5k in there on 1866+ RAM.

Reviews only use the i7 in their memory scaling benchmarks because they happen to have spares on-hands and it also gives them the best shot at showing some memory scaling with the four extra hardware threads giving the IMC a more thorough workout.
 


ahhh yes. You are right InvalidError. I suppose it wouldn't matter what speed of ram because you can just downclock it too. Their is not much performance difference either way and it boils down to how much meteora881 wants to shell out for RAM. That Anand page InvalidError posted does suggest going for 1866 for best bang/buck. There are plenty of overclockers with 1600 too on last page. None the less small gains
 

Yes, most of the changes are small to insignificant.

The "Minimum FPS" charts on the other hand do show some pretty significant improvements (20-30%) but that does not say much about how much of an actual gameplay experience improvement that really translates to. A more thorough metric like 95% frame-time variance would have been more representative of overall experience improvement and would likely have yielded far less impressive relative improvement numbers.
 


around 500...was looking at r9 290 r9 290x and gtx 780..so which would you go with and model?

which motherboard would you go with?
 
The motherboard you picked would suite your needs just fine. From personal experience the 780 does a very nice job of games. I have no regrets. Just FYI the 290x does run very hot but on the other hand you would have Mantle support. Mantle won't do too much for you as you have a very good CPU.
 
Solution