Gaming With AGP Graphics: Overclock That CPU!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, playing Crysis on low aint too fun :D. Still a 3850 with a 2.6GHz X2 is enough for mostly medium details at like 1024x768 or 1280x1024. Anyway yeah getting anything more than a 2600XT for an old AGP system requires an overclocked dual core. Would have been nice to see some numbers from an overclocked dual core P4, since there are a few of those on AGP out there, but I'm sure the results would have been pretty pretty sad ^_^.
 

masterjaw

Distinguished
Jun 4, 2009
1,159
0
19,360
40
This is a memorabilia on how AGP-based systems struggle to perform well with recent games. Still, an overall upgrade would still be way better than buying one of these old timers and try to suspend the inescapable destruction.
 

jamesedgeuk2000

Distinguished
Jul 21, 2009
173
0
18,680
0
"Still, an overall upgrade would still be way better than buying one of these old timers and try to suspend the inescapable destruction."

Yes because buying a new motherboard AND cpu AND memory AND gfx card is cheaper than buying a gfx card and overclocking your cpu isnt it?
 

manjyomethunder

Distinguished
Apr 20, 2009
46
0
18,530
0
[citation][nom]jamesedgeuk2000[/nom]"Still, an overall upgrade would still be way better than buying one of these old timers and try to suspend the inescapable destruction."Yes because buying a new motherboard AND cpu AND memory AND gfx card is cheaper than buying a gfx card and overclocking your cpu isnt it?[/citation]

In the long run yes, seeing as the AGP Radeon 4650 is twice the price of the PCI-Express version anyway, so there's some money saved right there anyway. In the case that you have one of these ridiculous Socket 939 ASRock boards with the AM2 daughterboard...I mean really? You'd rather buy an overpriced GPU, new RAM and an outdated CPU so that you don't have to buy an ENTIRELY new motherboard? It's not even worth it.
 

masterjaw

Distinguished
Jun 4, 2009
1,159
0
19,360
40
[citation][nom]jamesedgeuk2000[/nom]Yes because buying a new motherboard AND cpu AND memory AND gfx card is cheaper than buying a gfx card and overclocking your cpu isnt it?[/citation]

IIRC, I said better not cheaper. Sure thing, you could save some money by buying AGP chips for your aging components. Spending $100 for an AGP card that is way below the performance of the equally-priced 4850. Is it worth it? No. For the mean time, you could survive playing at low settings but how long will your system hold on? By the time your system quits, you might be even thinking if you should've saved that $100 and just upgraded the whole system for the long run. This AGP cards recently released are just a remedy, not a solution. Still a full upgrade is an imminent path that those with old systems must take.
 

marcos669

Distinguished
Aug 20, 2009
12
0
18,510
0
Well, this is better tomshardware, but isn´t still enough, put the AGP cards in an Asrock AliveDual-esata2 or the AM2NF3-VSTA,with athlon 5xxx or 7xxx and DDR2-800 memory, and you will see 3850 AGP can be much more competitive and Crysis can be Played in High settings.

I think i would be a good idea, but the web y your, of course, but it will be fine for this people that say the 3850 AGP is not fine, the would see they are completly wrong.
 

rickzor

Distinguished
Feb 11, 2007
506
0
18,990
2
Aww this is my motherboard! Although i dont use the daughterboard but instead a use the pci-e on the motherboard (yes it comes with both, pci-e and agp) with a gf9600gt, and a powerful athlon 64 3500+ overclocked to 2.5ghz.
It's my main computer.
 

rickzor

Distinguished
Feb 11, 2007
506
0
18,990
2
Aww this is my motherboard! Although i dont use the daughterboard but instead a use the pci-e on the motherboard (yes it comes with both, pci-e and agp) with a gf9600gt, and a powerful athlon 64 3500+ overclocked to 2.5ghz.
It's my main computer.
 

dingumf

Distinguished
Apr 20, 2009
313
0
18,780
0
Use your $100 for something else like a nice dinner.

Don't even bother upgrading because its still crap.

Either buy a new machine or don't even bother.
 

amnotanoobie

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2006
1,493
0
19,360
37
I think this could have been more interesting if HD movie playback was included. Some of these AGP systems might have really old cards, GF4 MX440, GF5 5600, ATi 9800, ATi X1600, etc.
 

techpops

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2009
56
0
18,630
0
[citation][nom]megamanx00[/nom]Yeah, playing Crysis on low aint too fun . Still a 3850 with a 2.6GHz X2 is enough for mostly medium details at like 1024x768 or 1280x1024. Anyway yeah getting anything more than a 2600XT for an old AGP system requires an overclocked dual core. Would have been nice to see some numbers from an overclocked dual core P4, since there are a few of those on AGP out there, but I'm sure the results would have been pretty pretty sad ^_^.[/citation]

Did you actually look at the benchmarks? I'm running a PC about the same speed as the one being tested here and play most games at 1680x1050 with most details up fairly high or at max. I can't use heavy anti-aliasing but at 1680x I don't really need that too badly.

And my CPU isn't overclocked so that isn't necessary at all. The old dual core cpu's from AMD are dirt cheap, at any speed so there really isn't a need to buy a middle of the road one

So where did this 1024x crap come from? There isn't a single game out that I could only run at 1024x. The lowest res I'll select is a widescreen 1280x which can look just fine considering how old this PC is.

This is aimed at the article. I have the 3850 and have no problems using the overclocking built into the driver. Not sure why that wasn't an option for you guys.
 

amorrd

Distinguished
Dec 17, 2008
4
0
18,510
0
thanks... enjoyed that article.

Wasn't expecting to see such a different between the O/C and the non O/C setup.

 

techpops

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2009
56
0
18,630
0
[citation][nom]masterjaw[/nom]IIRC, I said better not cheaper. Sure thing, you could save some money by buying AGP chips for your aging components. Spending $100 for an AGP card that is way below the performance of the equally-priced 4850. Is it worth it? No. For the mean time, you could survive playing at low settings but how long will your system hold on? By the time your system quits, you might be even thinking if you should've saved that $100 and just upgraded the whole system for the long run. This AGP cards recently released are just a remedy, not a solution. Still a full upgrade is an imminent path that those with old systems must take.[/citation]

What about the people who have been using this same system for years and are still finding it holds up for most games? I'd be one of these.

As for upgrading an AGP card now. Well that would depend entirely on funds. From a performance perspective of course it would ideal to buy a whole new set of components but if money is tight, a top of the line AGP card does hold its own today and its today you'll be using it. Without the money to upgrade to more modern hardware you can't really blame a lack of future proofing as that's just not an option for those people on a budget in this situation.

 

marcos669

Distinguished
Aug 20, 2009
12
0
18,510
0
[citation][nom]mitch074[/nom]That all means that I will have to...Overclock my X2 3800+. Damn. It's only 4 years old.[/citation]

Well, upgrading an Agp system diserves only in you already have a 3850 AGP, or if you already have a 939 o AM2 motherboard with a dual-core proccesor and if the motherboard only aceppts AGP cards.

For example upgrading a PC with a pentium 4 and a 1600 pro AGP card would be stupid, but upgrading a pentium 4 that already has a 3850 AGP oe 4670 AGP, will be fine for most os games.

There is one point of atention about the processor, if your processor is an dual-core 939 you must overclock it, by the other hand, if your processor is an AM2, like Athlon 5xxx o 7xxx you don´t need to overclock it, because ther is no bottleneck, or no so much between the am2 processor an the 3850/4670 AGP card.
 
Let me get this right, so you buy a half assed video card for some ancient machine and because, then you need a PSU so you buy one, then you need more ram, then your crappy motherboard dies so you end up with a pile of parts you spent dead money - waste of time.

Heres a better idea - forget "future proof" and forget "upgrading an old machine" (within reason) - my pc's usually survive 1 overhaul and 1 upgrade package then there scrapped etc - MUCH better lifespan

example: my rig started as a E6600 @ 3.2 + 2gb + 7900GT, and in one big batch i jumped to a Q6600, 8gb and 8800GT - final upgrade for it before i get a new rig.

And as for AGP vs PCIE - if i remember correctly, atleast with the Nvidia 6600GT the AGP variants were actually quicker then the PCIE variants and had to be underclocked to line up performance - AGP (8x) being "slow" compared to PCIE (1.0) is a myth.
 
With anti-aliasing (AA) and anisotropic filtering (AF) enabled, performance is still multiplied, except, strangely enough, for the AGP Radeon HD 4650. We can't easily blame this phenomenon on the AGP bus, because the AGP Radeon HD 3850 is still outperforming the PCI Express (PCIe) Radeon HD 4650. Perhaps the AGP Radeon HD 4650's beta driver is at fault here.
Why are we using beta drivers? FORCE install the latest drivers onto it - they work fine, ditch the outdated "AGP" modded drivers for new drivers.
 

marcos669

Distinguished
Aug 20, 2009
12
0
18,510
0
[citation][nom]apache_lives[/nom]Let me get this right, so you buy a half assed video card for some ancient machine and because, then you need a PSU so you buy one, then you need more ram, then your crappy motherboard dies so you end up with a pile of parts you spent dead money - waste of time.Heres a better idea - forget "future proof" and forget "upgrading an old machine" (within reason) - my pc's usually survive 1 overhaul and 1 upgrade package then there scrapped etc - MUCH better lifespanexample: my rig started as a E6600 @ 3.2 + 2gb + 7900GT, and in one big batch i jumped to a Q6600, 8gb and 8800GT - final upgrade for it before i get a new rig.And as for AGP vs PCIE - if i remember correctly, atleast with the Nvidia 6600GT the AGP variants were actually quicker then the PCIE variants and had to be underclocked to line up performance - AGP (8x) being "slow" compared to PCIE (1.0) is a myth.[/citation]

Well, ther is a lot of people that 1 year ago bought a 3850 AGP to play new games with their old pentium 4/athlon XP single core system and then they realize there was a huge bottleneck and can´t play new games, so they can´t give back the videocard to the shop, but they can now buy a Am2 AGP motherboard with an athñon 5xxx/7xxx and ddr2 memory for about 150 dolars/euros, and have a very competitive system.

There are also people that boutgh a 3850 AGP because their old AGP card sudenly broke, so they bought a 3850 AGP. For this people is also a good option to buy what i said before.

Finally i can asure that a 3850 AGP is as fast as a 3850 PCI-exprees.
 

rodney_ws

Splendid
Dec 29, 2005
3,819
0
22,810
17
Any AGP purchase in 2009 would definitely be considered a sunk cost... you're not getting that money back and you're not using the card on your next build... so I can't imagine buying a new AGP card. If you can score a cheap used one, go for it... otherwise, upgrade your rig.
 

mindless728

Splendid
Jul 15, 2008
4,074
0
22,960
89
well, i don't see my old computer as being worth it to upgrade (i have a newer one anyways) though it does have an nforce4 sli chipset, its just between s939 and DDR memory being expensive, its not worth it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY