GeForce GTX 295 In Quad-SLI

Status
Not open for further replies.

JeanLuc

Distinguished
Oct 21, 2002
979
0
18,990
2
I’m looking at page 9 on the power usage charts – I have to say the GTX295 is very impressive it’s power consumption isn’t that much greater then the GTX280. And what’s very impressive is it uses 40% less power in SLI then the HD4870X2 does in Crossfire., meaning if I already owned a pretty decent PSU say around 700-800 watt’s I wouldn’t have to worry about getting it replaced if I were planning on SLIing the GTX295.

I would have liked to have seen some temperatures in there somewhere as well. With top end cards becoming hotter and hotter (at least with ATI) I wonder if cheaper cases are able to cope with the temperatures these components generate.

BTW any chance of doing some sextuple SLI GTX295 on the old Intel Skulltrail?
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
[citation][nom]JeanLuc[/nom]BTW any chance of doing some sextuple SLI GTX295 on the old Intel Skulltrail?[/citation]

Not a chance: The GTX 295 only has one SLI bridge connector. NVIDIA designs its products intentionally to only support a maximum of four graphics cores, and in doing so eliminates the need to make its drivers support more.
 

neiroatopelcc

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2006
3,079
0
20,810
9
I'd like to see a board that takes up 3 slots, and use both the 1st and the 3rd slot's pcie connectors to power 4 gpu's on one board. Perhaps with the second pcie being optional - so in case of not fitting the card at all, one could fit it with reduced bandwidth. That way they'd have a basis to make some proper cooling. Perhaps a small h2o system, or a peltier coupled with some propler fan and heatsink.

ie. a big 3x3x9" box resting on the expansion slots, dumping warm air outside.
 

jameskangster

Distinguished
Aug 29, 2008
17
0
18,510
0
"...Radeon HD 4870 X2 knocked the GeForce GTX 280 from its performance
thrown." --> "throne"? or am I just misunderstanding the sentence?
 

kschoche

Distinguished
Jul 31, 2007
67
0
18,630
0
So the conclusion should read:
Congrats on quad-sli, though, for anything that doesnt already get 100+ fps with a single GX2, you're welcome to throw in a second and get at most a 10-20% increase, unless of course you want to get an increase to a game that doesnt already have 100 FPS (crysis), in which case you're screwed - dont even bother with it.
 

duzcizgi

Distinguished
Apr 12, 2006
243
0
18,680
0
Why test with AA and AF turned on with such high end cards? Anyone who pays +$400 * X wouldn't be playing any game with AA AF turned off or with low res. display. (If I'd pay $800 for graphics cards, I'd have of course had a display with no less than 1920x1200 resolution. Not even 1680x1050)
And I'm a little disappointed with the scaling of all solutions. They still don't scale well.
 

hyteck9

Distinguished
Jan 9, 2009
38
0
18,530
0
The performance per watt char is exactly what I wanted to see (it would be even better with some temps listed though). Thanks THG, This will help things along nicely.
 
G

Guest

Guest
duzcizgi, don't forget about the real hardcore players (those who play tournaments for example), who prefer to play with the lower graphics settings and ensure > 100 FPS.
 

topper743

Distinguished
Dec 6, 2007
407
0
18,790
4
Very informitive. I have one request going forward; when the testing teams do a 3Dmark Vantage test would they please include the standard 3Dmark06 benchmark results? Most users won't/don't use the vantage paid test. Vantage results have a different scoring and I and probably others can't interept what those scores mean for systems tested with just the 3Dmark06 standard tests.
 

L1qu1d

Splendid
Sep 29, 2007
4,615
0
22,790
4
Its kinda funny that the 3 way 280 GTX is still on top of the food chain, although it is more expensive:)

I still think that the best invested videocard to date would be who ever bought a 8800 GTX or Ultra considering they can still max out games and do well in high resolutions even copared to the 9800 GTXs, and alot of 512 meg card.

I mean 2006-2009 absolutely worth the 600$ in my opinion if you want to get by in gaming:D
 

neiroatopelcc

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2006
3,079
0
20,810
9
[citation][nom]L1qu1d[/nom]Its kinda funny that the 3 way 280 GTX is still on top of the food chain, although it is more expensiveI still think that the best invested videocard to date would be who ever bought a 8800 GTX or Ultra considering they can still max out games and do well in high resolutions even copared to the 9800 GTXs, and alot of 512 meg card.I mean 2006-2009 absolutely worth the 600$ in my opinion if you want to get by in gaming[/citation]

Correct - if we ignore that many g80 chips have been killed by heat since then, making it a bit less likely to make do with just one card in 3 years.

ps. released november 2006 - so basicly it's "just been" 2007 and 2008 without upgrades.
 

akandy

Distinguished
Apr 11, 2008
27
0
18,530
0
[citation][nom]L1qu1d[/nom]Its kinda funny that the 3 way 280 GTX is still on top of the food chain, although it is more expensiveI still think that the best invested videocard to date would be who ever bought a 8800 GTX or Ultra considering they can still max out games and do well in high resolutions even copared to the 9800 GTXs, and alot of 512 meg card.I mean 2006-2009 absolutely worth the 600$ in my opinion if you want to get by in gaming[/citation]

The GTX285 tri sli does a little better. http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gtx-285-review--3way-sli/13
 

computerninja7823

Distinguished
Sep 26, 2008
70
0
18,630
0
haha nvidia takes the crown!!...but truly ATI will come back and take the crown, then nvidia, then ATI and so forth and so-on... but its good to see the green giant back on top. i cant wait to see the new gt300 series cards!... i have to agree L1qu1d i have a 8800gt...dude it kicks some serious bootay!!! and heat was definetly the killer for the g80 series but using riva tuner i have been able up the fan speed to 80% then overclock my 8800gt and ROCKS!!!
 

Pei-chen

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2007
1,254
0
19,280
0
Very very nice review. I have been an advocate for 1.5GB+ RAM on video card ever since I got GTA4. It seems like ATI/Nvidia haven’t realize the need for larger buffer on $400+ cards.

Either way, I just bought a 4850 1GB OC to replace a fairly new G92b 9800GT as it only cost me about $20 to upgrade. I think the 512MB RAM on 9800GT is bottlenecking a few game at 1920*1200. Hopefully the 50% faster 4850 will solve that problem.
 

NightLight

Distinguished
Dec 7, 2004
552
0
18,990
1
i don't know, i'm getting pretty tired of sli... it should have died with the monster 3dII. I for one was releaved that the geforce series came out, a single card with enough power to play all the games you wanted on high settings, but now you have to spend a lot of cash to get the best graphics. Focus on a single card that can handle everything damnit!
 

L1qu1d

Splendid
Sep 29, 2007
4,615
0
22,790
4
[citation][nom]akandy[/nom]The GTX285 tri sli does a little better.[/citation]

Yeah but I mean its just an Overclocked 280 GTX other than that you have heat and power consumption. I really don't care about those since I have a 1000 watt corsair and really doesn't affect me much. (plus I don't pay for electricity).

I mean I got my 280s to 712 core clock stable soo really it wouldn't be worth the extra 20$ or so for these cards:) (if I do the bfg up)
 

billiardicus

Distinguished
Mar 2, 2008
186
0
18,680
0
Nice write up. A few comments: Why include 1680x1050? Anyone who has 2 gtx 295's and plays at 1680x1050 should be beaten and then shot. IMO it just made the graphs busier and harder to read.

Interesting that Crysis can still distroy even these god-like gpu setups.

I still say the GTX 280 is the king. Crossfire/SLI and multiple GPU's on one card don't impress me. They suck too much power, cost too much, require more expensive mobo's and psu's, and simply don't deliver bang/buck.
 

coopchennick

Distinguished
Dec 3, 2008
166
0
18,680
0
A quick check on Newegg told me most 280s (especially reference speed boards) are at $330, in which case the price for 3 gtx 280s is the same as 2 gtx 295s.
 

one-shot

Distinguished
Jan 13, 2006
1,369
0
19,310
8
With the dropping GTX280 prices, it may still be the better deal. $660 for GTX280 SLI or $900-$1000 for Quad 4870X2's or GTX295's. A GTX280 looks to be a great buy as of right now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS