GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost Review: A Budget-Oriented GK106-Based Boss

Status
Not open for further replies.

Souv_90

Honorable
Feb 12, 2013
25
0
10,540
1
anandtech review is out for 650 ti boost...just faster than 7790 and slower than 7850 in every games tested only except bf3 and Shogun

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6838/nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-boost-review-

(wonder why tom's review is swaying more in favour of kepler everytime I see)
 

EzioAs

Distinguished
Dec 6, 2011
2,306
0
20,160
135
This card pricing seems a little too good that it kinda makes me regret getting the GTX660 just a while ago. Damn it, I hate the Kepler series and their pricing :/

Although I can't say the same about the power consumption and some part in me actually hoped and expected the card would come with a game bundle.
 

Memnarchon

Distinguished
Oct 4, 2011
1,351
0
19,660
106
[citation][nom]Souv_90[/nom]anandtech review is out for 650 ti boost...just faster than 7790 and slower than 7850 in every games tested only except bf3 and Shogunhttp://www.anandtech.com/show/6838 [...] st-review-(wonder why tom's review is swaying more in favour of kepler everytime I see)[/citation]
Techpowerup said also that 650ti boost is faster than 7850.
edit: hardwarecanucks / PCPerspective. A lot of sites agree with Tom's, 7850 and 650ti boost are about the same in performance.

But the point is that is similar to 7850 while its cheaper. Now that's what I wanted to see when I was saying we need better performance for $$$. Now lets see AMD dropping its prices too so we can have a sweat war between them that profits our wallet :D.
 

tomfreak

Distinguished
May 18, 2011
1,334
0
19,280
0
It looks to me form the chart except the 7900. AMD GCN is are actually far more efficient here. Better compute + better performance/watt. So Nvidia taunting about their 'most efficient GPU' seems got defeated again. I wonder what if AMD make 7900 a 1.5x of 7800.

I still do not like the idea of Odd memory configuration. 1GB/2GB @ 192bit. The last 512MB from 2GB model is only getting 64bit memory bandwidth. Why cant they offer a a proper 1.5GB version @ middle price $159?

Tomshardware fail to bench 2GB 7850. I like to see that vs 2GB 650Ti Boost.
 

Henrik Olsson

Honorable
Mar 26, 2013
3
0
10,510
0
from reviews around the web the GTX 650 ti boost is trading blows with the 7850 very well. i just gotta say it took nvidia awhile to get back into the game after AMD lowerd the pricing of there cards. good to see some competion again insted of just going "get the AMD card they are cheaper"
 
darn it. i was enjoying reading the review considering i've been waiting to se how this card performs ever since i heard of it. 192bit interface with a cut-down gk106 under $170 and sli - makes gtx 650ti irrelevant and puts a good deal of hurt on the 128bit 7790 in terms of config. i doubt gtx650tiboost can outperform a 7790 in compute tasks but this is a gaming gfx card above all. this seems like a good proposition for budget 1080p gaming, so far.

now, if amd brings back 7850 1gb, it'd be awesome (i don't buy the 'lack of gddr5 chips' excuse for a second).

will there be gtx650tiboost sli performance analysis vs 7790 cfx and 7850 1gb cfx? hopefully nvidia has good drivers available because the sub $200 gfx card price war just got heated up.

edit: imho nvidia is late to the sub $200 gfx card price war. this card shoulda come out instead of gtx 650ti (128bit). amd should be updating with new gcn cards soon while kepler 2.0 seems nowhere in sight. better late(!) than never, i guess..
 

zooted

Distinguished
Feb 17, 2010
1,414
0
19,360
29
Nice, I like seeing the battle begin. Just like the batter of 6850/gtx460. I am really looking forward to see what both the 7790 and 650ti boost can do on non-beta drivers.
 

tomfreak

Distinguished
May 18, 2011
1,334
0
19,280
0
[citation][nom]FinneousPJ[/nom]I'd say the 7850 is still more worthwhile since it should respond to overclocking better.[/citation]it consume less power as well, it give free AAA bundle games. So the value are still better.
 

horaciopz

Distinguished
Nov 22, 2011
446
0
18,960
50
If it for Bandwidth and memory, still 7850 seems a better buy... I mean, comparing a 1000mhz core clock HD7850 vs a 1000mhz core clock GTX 650ti boots and we will see how the AMD card overcome and as soon as we apply antialising and stuff like that. Also When we overclock memory, the bigger bus width will help a lot on performance. But, we really need about pricing, for 150 bucks this card will have an upper hand against the HD7850 1GB...
 
[citation][nom]BigMack70[/nom]I feel like this has been the general theme of this 6xx/7xxx round between AMD and Nvidia... AMD releases something that's good but fairly conservative, and then Nvidia soon after comes in and just embarrasses them and makes AMD totally change up their pricing structure.I don't really mean that as a knock on AMD's cards/etc, just that I wish AMD would get a little more aggressive with their product launches... it's like they don't expect Nvidia to retaliate and they don't even try to anticipate what's coming.Great to see Nvidia getting more competitive in sub-$200 space where they are typically horrible. Now, if they could just release something to bring competition to the $80-100 space, the consumer will really have a win on their hands... competition at all price points![/citation]

Well, in the $80-100 space, Nvidia at least has GT 640 GDDR5s and probably a few GTX 650s, granted that the GTX 650 Ti's price drop makes them even less relevant.
 
[citation][nom]tomfreak[/nom]It looks to me form the chart except the 7900. AMD GCN is are actually far more efficient here. Better compute + better performance/watt. So Nvidia taunting about their 'most efficient GPU' seems got defeated again. I wonder what if AMD make 7900 a 1.5x of 7800. I still do not like the idea of Odd memory configuration. 1GB/2GB @ 192bit. The last 512MB from 2GB model is only getting 64bit memory bandwidth. Why cant they offer a a proper 1.5GB version @ middle price $159?Tomshardware fail to bench 2GB 7850. I like to see that vs 2GB 650Ti Boost.[/citation]

The memory capacity difference really doesn't matter for this article. The 2GB version of the 7850 doesn't perform any better than the 1GB version, it simply doesn't get slammed in a few VRAM capacity-heavy situations whereas the 7850 1GB does (none of which are in this article anyway).
 

ingtar33

Illustrious
though team red has generally won the last 18 months gpu war with better pricing in the 7xxx vs 6xx battle... and generally better performance for that pricing, this type of thing really warms my heart. Because NVidia hasn't been particularly competitive recently in price, you see the Radeon gpus edging up in price recently as a result. This should upset the apple cart nicely.

Price wars are great for consumers, so let this one begin!
 
[citation][nom]zooted[/nom]I figured amd would release a 7850 ghz addition considering how easily they reach 1ghz+ with out much effort.[/citation]

I doubt it. AMD didn't release a GHz Edition of any of the other 2nd tier cards. It'd make them each too close to their first tier models such as the 7770, 7870, and 7970.
 

SvRommelvS

Honorable
Feb 25, 2013
48
0
10,530
0
How will this perform in 3-way SLI? At $510, it will just have to be better than some of the flashier 680s and 7970 ghz editions to be a consideration and I suspect it will be much, much better than that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS